Background
Gender-affirming vaginoplasty aims to create the external female genitalia (vulva) as well as the internal vaginal canal; however, not all patients desire nor can safely undergo vaginal canal creation.
Aim
Our objective is to describe the factors influencing patient choice or surgeon recommendation of vulvoplasty and to assess the patient’s satisfaction with this choice.
Methods
Gender-affirming genital surgery consults were reviewed from March 2015 until December 2017, and patients scheduled for or who had completed vulvoplasty were interviewed by telephone.
Outcomes
We report demographic data and the reasons for choosing vulvoplasty as gender-affirming surgery for patients who either completed or were scheduled for surgery, in addition to patient reports of satisfaction with choice of surgery, satisfaction with the surgery itself, and sexual activity after surgery.
Results
In total, 486 patients were seen in consultation for trans-feminine gender-affirming genital surgery: 396 requested vaginoplasty and 39 patients requested vulvoplasty. 30 Patients either completed or are scheduled for vulvoplasty. Vulvoplasty patients were older and had higher body mass index than those seeking vaginoplasty. The majority (63%) of the patients seeking vulvoplasty chose this surgery despite no contra-indications to vaginoplasty. The remaining patients had risk factors leading the surgeon to recommend vulvoplasty. Of those who completed surgery, 93% were satisfied with the surgery and their decision for vulvoplasty.
Clinical Translation
Vulvoplasty creates the external appearance of female genitalia without creation of a neovaginal canal; it is associated with high satisfaction and low decision regret.
Conclusions
This is the first study of factors impacting a patient’s choice of or a surgeon’s recommendation for vulvoplasty over vaginoplasty as gender-affirming genital surgery; it also is the first reported series of patients undergoing vulvoplasty only. Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, non-validated questions, short-term follow-up, and selection bias in how we offer vulvoplasty. Vulvoplasty is a form of gender-affirming feminizing surgery that does not involve creation of a neovagina, and it is associated with high satisfaction and low decision regret.
OBJECTIVE:
To describe the incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction in transgender women undergoing gender-affirming vaginoplasty and outcomes in a program providing pelvic floor physical therapy (PT).
METHODS:
We conducted a retrospective, single-institution study on vaginoplasty patients between May 1, 2016, and February 28, 2018; all were referred for pelvic floor PT. We reviewed medical records for baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, prior surgeries, insurance data, attendance at pelvic floor PT, and dilation success at 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS:
Seventy-two of 77 patients (94%) attended pelvic floor PT at least once. Preoperative pelvic floor PT identified a high incidence of potential problems: 42% had pelvic floor dysfunction, 37% had bowel dysfunction. Of those patients found to have dysfunction preoperatively, the rate of resolution by the first postoperative visit of pelvic floor and bowel dysfunction were 69% and 73%, respectively. There were significantly lower rates of pelvic floor dysfunction postoperatively for those patients who attended pelvic floor PT both preoperatively and postoperatively compared with only postoperatively (28% vs 86%, P=.006). Patients reporting a history of abuse had a significantly higher rate of preoperative pelvic floor muscle dysfunction (91% vs 31%, P<.001). Successful dilation at 3 months in all patients was 89%.
CONCLUSION:
Pelvic floor physical therapists identify and help patients resolve pelvic floor-related problems before and after surgery. We find strong support for pelvic floor PT for patients undergoing gender-affirming vaginoplasty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.