This article aims to study the relationship between today's canonical and noncanonical authors in the domain of early modern natural philosophy through the lens of social network analysis. By studying a massive corpus of letters (Electronic Enlightenment project), we examine the structural relationship between several of today's canonical authors in natural philosophy and noncanonical women philosophers operating in the same network. We demonstrate the structure of this network and its effects on noncanonical authors. By modeling the case of women philosophers, we show that our model can be used to identify further noncanonical authors who had similar profiles.Quantitative hermeneutics is the art of understanding conventions-forms, genres, styles, practices-better than their society ever did. (F. Moretti, Patterns and Interpretation, Stanford Literary Lab, pamphlet 15 [2017])