Key Points• There is a need to identify the best HLA haplotypemismatched related donor.• Use of young, male, NIMAmismatched donors results in the best survival after HLA haplotype-mismatched related donor transplants. Older sister donors were inferior to father donors with regard to NRM (HR 5 1.87; 95% CI 5 1.10-3.20; P 5 .02) and survival (HR 5 1.59; 95% CI 5 1.05-2.40; P 5 .03). Noninherited maternal antigen-mismatched sibling donors were associated with the lowest incidence of acute GVHD compared with parental donors and noninherited paternal antigen-mismatched sibling donors. Specific HLA disparities were not significantly correlated with transplant outcomes. Our data indicate which HLA haplotypemismatched related donors are associated with the best transplant outcomes in persons with hematological neoplasms. (Blood. 2014; 124(6):843-850)

BACKGROUND: Many patients who require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) lack a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. Recently, a new strategy was developed for HLA-mismatched/haploidentical transplantation from family donors without in vitro T cell depletion (TCD). METHODS: Over the past 9 years, 756 patients underwent haploidentical transplantation using a protocol developed by the authors, which combines granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-primed bone marrow (G-BM) and peripheral blood stem cells without in vitro TCD. The long-term outcome with this treatment modality was reported, and a risk-factor analysis was provided. RESULTS: Of these patients, 752 (99%) achieved sustained, full donor chimerism. The incidence of grades 2 through 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 43%, and the 2-year cumulative incidence of total chronic GVHD was 53%. The 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 18%. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 15% and 26% in the standard-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Of the 756 patients, 480 survived throughout the follow-up period of 1154 days (range: 335-3511 days) with the 3-year leukemia-free survival rates of 68% and 49% in the standard-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Lower leukemia-free survival was associated with high-risk disease status (P ¼.001), chronic myelogenous leukemia disease type (P ¼.004), neutrophil engraftment beyond 13 days after transplant (P ¼.012), and the occurrence of grades 2 through 4 acute GVHD (P ¼.019). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the authors' 9-year experience showed that G-BM combined with peripheral blood stem cells from haploidentical donors, without in vitro TCD, is a reliable source of stem cells for transplantation by using the

Key Points• Risk stratification treatment of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia may decrease relapse and improve longterm survival.• Allo-HSCT benefited high-risk patients, but impaired the survival of low-risk patients.We aimed to improve the outcome of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the first complete remission (CR1) by applying risk-directed therapy based on minimal residual disease (MRD) determined by RUNX1/RUNX1T1 transcript levels. Risk-directed therapy included recommending allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for high-risk patients and chemotherapy/autologous-HSCT (auto-HSCT) for low-risk patients. Among 116 eligible patients, MRD status after the second consolidation rather than induction or first consolidation could discriminate high-risk relapse patients (P 5 .001).Allo-HSCT could reduce relapse and improve survival compared with chemotherapy for high-risk patients (cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR]: 22.1% vs 78.9%, P < .0001; disease-free survival [DFS]: 61.7% vs 19.6%, P 5 .001), whereas chemotherapy/auto-HSCT achieved a low relapse rate (5.3%) and high DFS (94.7%) for low-risk patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that MRD status and treatment choice were independent prognostic factors for relapse, DFS, and OS. We concluded that MRD status after the second consolidation may be the best timing for treatment choice. MRD-directed risk stratification treatment may improve the outcome of t(8;21) AML in CR1. This trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org as #ChiCTR- OCH-12002406. (Blood. 2013;121(20):4056-4062)

We studied the impact of risk stratificationdirected interventions for minimal residual disease (MRD) on relapse and disease-free survival (DFS) prospectively in 814 subjects with standard-risk acute leukemia receiving allotransplantation in first or second complete remission. A total of 709 subjects were MRD ؊ after transplantation (Group A); 105 subjects were MRD ؉ , 49 received low-dose IL-2 (Group B), and 56 received modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with or without low-dose IL-2 (Group C).Posttransplantation immune suppression for GVHD was also modified based on MRD state. The cumulative risk of relapse was significantly less and DFS was significantly better in subjects in Group C than in subjects in Group B (P ‫؍‬ .001 and P ‫؍‬ .002, respectively), but was not different from subjects in Group A (P ‫؍‬ .269 and P ‫؍‬ .688, respectively