Background: Vessel size discrepancy is one of the major risk factors for anastomotic failure in free flap transfer. The situation becomes challenging for reconstructive microsurgeons when the recipient vein is much smaller than the flap vein. We investigated the feasibility of large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis for such cases. Materials and methods: The subjects were 16 consecutive patients who underwent a free flap transfer for oncologic defects with a large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis. The larger flap vein was anastomosed to the side slit of the smaller recipient vein under an operating microscope. Surgical details and postoperative outcome were investigated retrospectively. Results: An anterolateral thigh flap was used in five patients, a superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in four, a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in three, and a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and a fibular osteocutaneous flap in two patients each. The internal mammary vein and the anterior tibial vein were most frequently used as a recipient vein (four patients each), followed by the deep inferior epigastric vein (three patients). The extent of vessel size discrepancy ranged from 1.3-to 3.3-fold, and the mean discrepancy was 1.9-fold. No anastomotic failure occurred postoperatively, and the flap survived in all patients. Conclusions: Large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis can be a versatile option when only a small vein is available as a recipient vein. Internal mammary, deep inferior epigastric, and anterior tibial veins are good candidates for this technique.

Reconstruction of a full‐thickness trunk defect is challenging because of the complex nature of such defects, which include the chest wall, abdominal wall, and diaphragm. We herein describe three patients in whom extensive trunk defects after sarcoma resection were reconstructed with a latissimus dorsi flap and an anterolateral thigh flap. In two patients, the defect included both the chest wall and the abdominal wall. The other patient had an extensive full‐thickness chest wall defect. The size of the anterolateral thigh flap for each patient was 34 × 10 cm, 26 × 15 cm, and 23 × 5 cm, respectively. Although one patient required take‐back for additional venous drainage, all wounds healed with no other complications. No respiratory dysfunction or abdominal wall hernia occurred in any patients. The combined use of a latissimus dorsi flap and an anterolateral thigh flap may provide reliable coverage of an extensive trunk defect and robust support of the chest and abdominal walls. Additionally, the availability of a two‐team approach without a positional change makes this combination a versatile reconstructive option.

Reconstruction after radical forequarter amputation for recurrent proximal extremity sarcoma is challenging because the defect is significant, and the axillary or subclavian vessels are resected with the tumor, indicating that the pedicle of nearby flaps is often cut off. Free flaps are commonly used to cover the defect, but the donor site morbidity is problematic. Another problem with resecting the axillary or subclavian vessels is difficulty obtaining recipient vessels with matching calibers for another free flap. The authors presented 2 cases that successfully solved all these problems by covering the defects by the forearm fillet flaps.The forearm fillet flap has the advantage of using a portion that is usually discarded, so there is no donor site morbidity. Moreover, using the brachial artery as the pedicle of the flap allows the anastomosis to the stump of the resected axillary or subclavian artery because differences in caliber are slight.The use of the forearm fillet flaps has been reported less frequently than the fillet flaps in the lower extremities, and most cases are posttraumatic. In cases of trauma, complications are reported to occur in about 1 in 4 patients, but in cases after tumor resection, ischemic time can be controlled, and there are no risks of contamination or unnoticed forearm damage, so more stable results can be expected as in this report.Using the free flap from the distal portion of the resected upper limb, especially in cases with a short prognosis, is a viable option that effectively minimizes damage to the donor site and maintains quality of life.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.