An urgent need exists for graduate and professional schools to establish evidence-based STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) pipeline programs to increase the diversity of the biomedical workforce. An untapped yet promising pool of willing participants are capable high school students that have a strong STEM interest but may lack the skills and the guided mentoring needed to succeed in competitive STEM fields. This study evaluates and compares the impact of the Loma Linda University (LLU) Summer Health Disparities Research Program on high school (HS) and undergraduate (UG) student participants. The primary focus of our summer research experience (SRE) is to enhance the research self-efficacy of the participants by actively involving them in a research project and by providing the students with personalized mentoring and targeted career development activities, including education on health disparities. The results of our study show that our SRE influenced terminal degree intent and increased participant willingness to incorporate research into future careers for both the HS and the UG groups. The quantitative data shows that both the HS and the UG participants reported large, statistically significant gains in self-assessed research skills and research self-efficacy. Both participant groups identified the hands-on research and the mentor experience as the most valuable aspects of our SRE and reported increased science skills, increased confidence in science ability and increased motivation and affirmation to pursue a science career. The follow-up data indicates that 67% of the HS participants and 90% of the UG participants graduated from college with a STEM degree; for those who enrolled in graduate education, 61% and 43% enrolled in LLU, respectively. We conclude that structured SREs can be highly effective STEM strengthening interventions for both UG and HS students and may be a way to measurably increase institutional and biomedical workforce diversity.
Estrous cyclicity was studied to examine the possibility that strain differences in the regularity of the mouse estrous cycle are the result of different olfactory signals produced by the male. Females with regular estrous cycles (lines E and S1) were housed in the olfactory presence of males from a line with irregular cycles (line CN-) or in the presence of males of their own line (used as a control). Females with irregular cycles (line CN-) were housed in the presence of males from a line with regular cycles (line E) or were exposed to males of their own line. The regularity of the estrous cycle decreased in line E females (regular cycles) when exposed to line CN- males (irregular cycles). The decreased regularity of line E cyclicity resulted from an increased period of diestrus, i.e., lengthening of the cycle. In contrast, line S1 females (regular cycles) did not show any change in estrous cyclicity when exposed to line CN- males. The period of diestrus increased in line CN- females when they were exposed to line E males. These results provide evidence that 1) the genotype of the male can influence the regularity of the estrous cycle, and 2) the genotype of the female regulates her responsiveness to environmental factors (e.g., male odor).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.