IntroductionEmergency Medicine (EM) personnel in both military and civilian prehospital settings are often exposed to stressful and extreme events. Therefore, a cross-pollination between both contexts in terms of coping strategies may generate new information for purposes of training, prevention, and support programs. In the current study, we aimed at comparing both contexts to understand the type of stress events personnel experience; whether experience differs between civilian and military personnel; and how they cope with it.MethodsWe used a mixed method approach, combining the results of a quantitative questionnaire and a thematic analysis of 23 in-depth semi-structured interviews to gain additional qualitative information.ResultsWhereas the questionnaire pointed to a significant preference for task-oriented coping over avoidant and emotion-oriented coping, the interviews offered a more nuanced insight, showing a constant aim to position themselves on a continuum between emotional disconnection from the patient to preserve operationality on the one hand; and remaining enough empathic to preserve humanity on the other hand. We further identified an ambivalent awareness regarding emotions and stress, a vulnerable disbalance between an excessive passion for the job with the sacrifice of own's personal life (for a growing volatile and dangerous working environment) and a lack of recognition from both the patient and organizational environment. The combination of these factors may carry the risk for moral injury and compassion fatigue. Therefore, mutual trust between the organizational level and EM personnel as well as among team members is crucial.DiscussionThe results are discussed from a systemic SHELL perspective, indicating how the specific profile of EM personnel relates to the software, hardware, environmental and liveware components of their professional and private life. Trainings on stress- and risk awareness should be approached both on an individual and systemic level, knowing that there is clearly no “one-size-fits-all” manner.

IntroductionIsolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments such as found at Antarctic, Arctic, and other remote research stations are considered space-analogs to study the long duration isolation aspects of operational space mission conditions.MethodsWe interviewed 24 sojourners that participated in different short/long duration missions in an Antarctic (Concordia, Halley VI, Rothera, Neumayer II) or non-Antarctic (e.g., MDRS, HI-SEAS) station or in polar treks, offering a unique insight based on first-hand information on the nature of demands by ICE-personnel at multiple levels of functioning. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis to explore how sojourners were trained, prepared, how they experienced the ICE-impact in function of varieties in environment, provided trainings, station-culture, and type of mission.ResultsThe ICE-environment shapes the impact of organizational, interpersonal, and individual working- and living systems, thus influencing the ICE-sojourners' functioning. Moreover, more specific training for operating in these settings would be beneficial. The identified pillars such as sensory deprivation, sleep, fatigue, group dynamics, displacement of negative emotions, gender-issues along with coping strategies such as positivity, salutogenic effects, job dedication and collectivistic thinking confirm previous literature. However, in this work, we applied a systemic perspective, assembling the multiple levels of functioning in ICE-environments.DiscussionA systemic approach could serve as a guide to develop future preparatory ICE-training programs, including all the involved parties of the crew system (e.g., family, on-ground crew) with attention for the impact of organization- and station-related subcultures and the risk of unawareness about the impact of poor sleep, fatigue, and isolation on operational safety that may occur on location.

Introduction:Although prehospital emergency care in a civilian versus military context may differ in terms of working conditions and injuries, in both contexts the exposure to stressful and extreme events are present. Besides the continuous reports of post-traumatic stress symptoms, an alarming increase of burnout and suicide in (emergency) physicians is recognized as well. However, most of the research on this topic is either retrospective or peri-recovery, which might have an impact on the availability of information with regard to causes and underlying processes. Hence, in the current study, we conducted an in-depth study of well-functioning emergency caretakers, studying their profile while including their perspective on both their professional and personal context and the interconnectedness with their operational performance.Method:We used a mixed method approach, combining the results of a quantitative questionnaire and a thematic analysis of 23 in-depth semi-structured interviews to gain additional qualitative information. We interviewed well-functioning and operating prehospital emergency professionals, recruited in three different settings, i.e., a military hospital, a military Special Operations Surgical Team, and a civilian hospital in the capital city.Results:The quantitative part showed a preference for task-oriented coping. However, the interviews broadened this result, showing how the personnel are continuously seeking to find a balance between emotional connection and disconnection. Several risk-factors for mental injury were detected and the support and recognition from both the personal and professional environment showed to be crucial in finding a balance between job passion and the sacrifice of one's personal life.Conclusion:The interviews showed that a variety of interrelated underlying professional and personal factors are related with how emergency personnel perceive and cope with stress events. A systemic approach to prevent mental health problems is highly recommended.