Background: It is not yet clear whether glycemic control affects the clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients. Methods and Results:This study compared the effects of glycemic control on the clinical outcome in 2 groups of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent PCI: a poor-glycemic-control group, who showed greater than 6.9% HbA1c at the time of PCI (Pre-HbA1c) ('≥6.9 group', n=334 patients) and a good-glycemic-control group, who showed less than <6.9% at Pre-HbA1c ('<6.9 group', n=212 patients). The patients in the ≥6.9 group were further divided into 2 groups for further comparisons: a 'DM control group' and a 'Poor control group'. At follow-up (300 days), the incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was significantly (P<0.05) lower in the <6.9 group (18.4% vs. 26.2%). However, there was no difference in MACE between the DM control group and the Poor control group. In a multivariate analysis, there was no relationship between the incidence of MACE and PreHbA1c, Pre-HbA1c ≥6.9% or the HbA1c difference (Pre-HbA1c -HbA1c at follow-up). Conclusions:Clinical outcomes in the <6.9 group were superior to those in the ≥6.9 group as pre-PCI glycemic control affected the baseline characteristics. The results suggested that glycemic control started at PCI was not associated with an improvement in the clinical outcome at follow-up. (Circ J 2011; 75: 791 - 799)

No abstract

Lower level of EPA/AA is a common critical risk factor for ACS in middle-aged older patients as well as younger adult patients. Some of the risk factors for the onset of ACS in younger patients were different from those in older patients.

Angulated lesion was classified in moderate risk lesion subset in PTCA guidelines 2000, because angulated lesion has been associated with abrupt closure or myocardial injury. We compared angiographic late loss at 6-9 months in bending lesions to that in non-bending lesion. This study included 227 lesions (de nowo) who were implanted Cypher Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). There were 52 bending lesions (22.9%) and 175 non-bending lesions (77.1%). There were no significant differences in age and complicated disease between the two groups except the higher prevalence of prior cerebral infarction in the bending lesion group. There were more eccentric lesions in the bending group than in the non-bending group (43.7% vs. 63.5%, p=0.01). Follow-up MLD (in stent) was not significantly different between the two groups (p=NS) and the angiographic restenosis rate was 23.6% in bending lesions and 17.8% in non-bending lesions (p=NS). In-stent and in-segment late loss were similar between the two groups (0.09+/-0.58 vs. 0.18+/-0.64, p=NS, 0.06+/-0.50 vs. 0.09+/-0.65, p=NS). No stent fracture was observed by angiography and IVUS in this study. Follow-up MLD (in stent) was not significantly different between the two groups (p=NS) and the angiographic restenosis rate was 23.6% in bending lesions and 17.8% in non-bending lesions (p=NS). Lesion bending is not associated with long-term angiographic late loss after DES implantation. DES may reduce clinical events in patients with bending lesion.

No abstract