A simple bone cyst (SBC) is a benign bone lesion of unknown etiology. It can be differentiated from an aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) by radiologic and histopathologic features, as well as by the absence of fusions of the USP6 gene characteristic of an ABC. In an attempt to differentiate between ABC and SBC in a recurrent bone cyst, we performed targeted RNA sequencing and found an EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion and no fusion of the USP6 gene. We subsequently analyzed additional 10 cysts, consistent with SBCs after radiologic-pathologic correlation, for the presence of an NFATC2 gene fusion, by targeted RNA sequencing, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing, and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Targeted RNA sequencing showed a FUS-NFATC2 fusion in 4 of 11 SBCs and an EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion in 2 of 11 SBCs. No fusion was identified in 3 SBCs and the analysis was not successful in 2 SBCs because of the low quantity or poor quality of isolated RNA. All the 6 fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing were confirmed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing, and 5 of the 6 fusions by fluorescent in situ hybridization. An additional FUS-NFATC2 fusion was identified by RT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, and fluorescent in situ hybridization in 1 of the 3 cases negative for fusions by targeted RNA sequencing. At least a large subset of SBCs represents cystic neoplasms characterized by FUS-NFATC2 or EWSR1-NFATC2 fusions, which also define a group of distinct, rare “Ewing-like” sarcomas that predominantly arise in long bones. Our results provide additional evidence of the existence of benign lesions with FUS-NFATC2 or EWSR1-NFATC2 fusions. Although they can recur locally in a nondestructive manner, their clinical course and possible relation to sarcoma with EWSR1-NFATC2 or FUS-NFATC2 fusion remains to be elucidated.

No abstract

Aims: PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a tumour-associated antigen that is preferentially strongly expressed in most cutaneous melanomas but not or only focally in naevi. Our aim was to evaluate PRAME expression in melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. Methods and results: Surgical specimens of 114 conjunctival melanocytic naevi of different types (including 67 common, 25 combined deep penetrating and 21 inflamed juvenile naevi), 30 invasive melanomas, 10 in-situ melanomas, 23 primary acquired melanoses (PAM) without atypia and 11 PAM with atypia were analysed for PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry. Nuclear positivity for PRAME in melanocytes was assessed as the percentage of positive nuclei: negative (0%), 1+ (1-25%), 2+ (26-50%), 3+ (51-75%) and 4+ (> 75%). In 113 of 114 conjunctival melanocytic naevi, PRAME was either completely negative or focally 1+ positive. Diffuse 4+ PRAME expression was identified in 17 of 30 (57%) invasive melanomas, seven of 10 (70%) in-situ melanomas, four of five (80%) PAM with severe atypia, none of three PAM with moderate atypia, none of three PAM with mild atypia, one of 23 (4%) PAM without atypia and none of 114 naevi. Diffuse 4+ PRAME expression in invasive melanomas correlated with a higher mitotic count but was not related to age and gender of the patients, Breslow thickness, location or mutational status. Conclusion: Diffuse 4+ PRAME positivity is highly specific for malignant conjunctival melanocytic lesions. PRAME is therefore a useful ancillary marker to support the diagnosis of a suspected conjunctival melanoma.

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a benign but locally aggressive neoplasm, with a tendency for local recurrence. In contrast to other bone tumors with secondary cystic change, ABC is characterized by USP6 gene rearrangement. There is a growing list of known USP6 fusion partners, characterization of which has been enabled with the advent of next‐generation sequencing (NGS). The list of known fusion partners includes CDH11, CNBP, COL1A1, CTNNB1, EIF1, FOSL2, OMD, PAFAH1B1, RUNX2, SEC31A, SPARC, STAT3, THRAP3, and USP9X. Using NGS, we analyzed a series of 11 consecutive ABCs and identified USP6 fusions in all cases, providing further evidence that USP6 fusions are universally present in primary ABCs. We identified four novel fusion partners in five ABCs and confirmed them by RT‐PCR and Sanger sequencing, ASAP1, FAT1, SAR1A, and TNC (in two cases). Because of high sensitivity and specificity, detection of a USP6 fusion by NGS may assist in differentiating between ABC and its mimics, especially in small biopsy samples when a definite diagnosis cannot be achieved on morphological grounds alone. Further studies with a large number of cases and follow‐up are needed to determine whether different fusion partners are associated with specific clinical and pathologic features of ABCs.

BackgroundDeep penetrating nevus (DPN) is not a widely recognised lesion on the conjunctiva and only a few cases consistent with combined DPN have been reported.MethodsA review of all excised and histopathologically diagnosed conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2003 and 2018 was performed in order to identify melanocytic nevi morphologically consistent with DPN.ResultsThirty-four DPN were identified among 361 histopathologically examined conjunctival nevi (9.4%), including 33 (97%) combined with a common nevus and 1 (3%) pure DPN. The patients’ age ranged from 7 to 51 years (median, 22 years). Clinically, 21 of 29 (72%) lesions with available data were darkly pigmented, and an increase in size and/or pigmentation was noted in 13 of 18 (72%) lesions with known history. All 24 lesions in which an immunohistochemical analysis was possible were diffusely positive for BRAFV600E (in DPN and common nevus components) and showed a diffuse nuclear positivity for beta catenin and cyclin D1 in the DPN component. None of the 21 lesions with available follow-up data recurred during a follow-up period from 0.3 to 16.3 years (median, 7.5 years).ConclusionsDPN of the conjunctiva is a relatively common lesion and usually presents as a combined nevus. Genetically, DPN of the conjunctiva are characterised by a combination of BRAFV600E mutation and activation of the beta catenin pathway. Recognition of DPN of the conjunctiva is important in order not to overdiagnose it as a melanoma, and to explain its potential atypical clinical features. DPN of the conjunctiva seems to be a benign lesion.