A need exists for a mock circulation that behaves in a physiologic manner for testing cardiac devices in normal and pathologic states. To address this need, an integrated mock cardiovascular system consisting of an atrium, ventricle, and systemic and coronary vasculature was developed specifically for testing ventricular assist devices (VADs). This test configuration enables atrial or ventricular apex inflow and aortic outflow cannulation connections. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of the mock ventricle to mimic the Frank-Starling response of normal, heart failure, and cardiac recovery conditions. The pressure-volume relationship of the mock ventricle was evaluated by varying ventricular volume over a wide range via atrial (preload) and aortic (afterload) occlusions. The input impedance of the mock vasculature was calculated using aortic pressure and flow measurements and also was used to estimate resistance, compliance, and inertial mechanical properties of the circulatory system. Results demonstrated that the mock ventricle pressure-volume loops and the end diastolic and end systolic pressure-volume relationships are representative of the Starling characteristics of the natural heart for each of the test conditions. The mock vasculature can be configured to mimic the input impedance and mechanical properties of native vasculature in the normal state. Although mock circulation testing systems cannot replace in vivo models, this configuration should be well suited for developing experimental protocols, testing device feedback control algorithms, investigating flow profiles, and training surgical staff on the operational procedures of cardiovascular devices.
This study investigated the hemodynamic and left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume loop responses to continuous versus pulsatile assist techniques at 50% and 100% bypass flow rates during simulated ventricular pathophysiologic states (normal, failing, recovery) with Starling response behavior in an adult mock circulation. The rationale for this approach was the desire to conduct a preliminary investigation in a well controlled environment that cannot be as easily produced in an animal model or clinical setting. Continuous and pulsatile flow ventricular assist devices (VADs) were connected to ventricular apical and aortic root return cannulae. The mock circulation was instrumented with a pressure-volume conductance catheter for simultaneous measurement of aortic root pressure and LV pressure and volume; a left atrial pressure catheter; a distal aortic pressure catheter; and aortic root, aortic distal, VAD output, and coronary flow probes. Filling pressures (mean left atrial and LV end diastolic) were reduced with each assist technique; continuous assist reduced filling pressures by 50% more than pulsatile. This reduction, however, was at the expense of a higher mean distal aortic pressure and lower diastolic to systolic coronary artery flow ratio. At full bypass flow (100%) for both assist devices, there was a pronounced effect on hemodynamic parameters, whereas the lesser bypass flow (50%) had only a slight influence. Hemodynamic responses to continuous and pulsatile assist during simulated heart failure differed from normal and recovery states. These findings suggest the potential for differences in endocardial perfusion between assist techniques that may warrant further investigation in an in vivo model, the need for controlling the amount of bypass flow, and the importance in considering the choice of in vivo model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.