Treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) of the brain is challenging due to the size and location of the nidus-proper and its proximity to the cerebrovascular circulation. Recent advances in catheter techniques and new embolization materials such as Onyx (a liquid agent that is less adhesive and slowly polymerizing) have increased the probability of achieving obliteration. When planning radiosurgical cases following such embolization, however, one must be cognizant of the distortions introduced by this novel substance on imaging studies. A sample of Onyx was irradiated to define the attenuation per mm thickness. The difference in attenuation compared to water was determined. Dose calculations were performed using 3 methods of inhomogeneity corrections. Homogeneous calculations were compared to "standard" heterogeneity corrections and to "modified" heterogeneity corrections by assigning individual electron densities to the normal brain and the Onyx. The difference between the attenuation of water in comparison to the Onyx was approximately 3% for beam energy of 6 MV. Best calculation results were achieved when using the modified inhomogeneity corrections which were based on the actual attenuation of the Onyx. The use of Onyx caused significant image artifact on MR and especially CT. As such, a correction must be manually introduced into the planning system to account for this potential error. Otherwise, dose calculation may be unreliable and could have dire consequences for patients receiving high doses of radiotherapy.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundTo evaluate the effect of the 3D radiation field design on normal tissues compared with commonly used appositional fields in patients with lumbar spine metastases.Methods and materialsTen comparative treatment plans for radiation of lumbar spine metastases were compared for posterior and anterior- posterior fields with 3D plans.ResultsThe PTV coverage in all comparative plans was similar. V 15 of the bowel in 3D, AP-PA and PA plans was 6.7 Gy (SD 6.47), 39.8 Gy (SD 11.4) and 37.3 Gy (SD15.7), respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean dose to both kidneys was 9.6 Gy (SD 4.8), 4.1 Gy (SD 3.9) and 4.6 Gy (SD 4.4) for appropriate plans (p = 0.002). Maximal dose to the spinal cord was 30.6 Gy (SD 2.1), 33.1 Gy (SD 9.8) and 37.7 Gy (SD 2) for 3D, AP-PA and PA plans.Conclusion3D conformal treatment planning of lumbar vertebral metastases was significantly better in term of bowel and spinal cord exposure compared to AP-PA and PA techniques. The exposure of the kidneys in 3D plans, while greater than in the comparative plans, did not violate accepted dose-volume thresholds.