Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish a statistics on the contemporary use of classical mobile orthodontic appliances, anchorage means and certain procedures (functional exercises) among orthodontic specialists. Material and Methods: The present study was based on a questionary comprising 15 questions addressed to 55 postgraduate, specialist and senior orthodontists concernig the use of classical orthodontic methods. The questionary was delivered online by means of Google Forms and intermediated by the National Dentists‘ Association of Tirgu Mures, Romania. The sole inclusion criteria was the specialty of orthodontics. Results: 92,7% of the orthodontists use removable appliances (palatal plate with expansion screw), 90,9 % recommend functional exercises (correct palatal tongue placement), 89,1% exploit space maintainers, 87,3% provide lingual cribs for functional reeducation, 80% apply functional devices and the Goshgarian arch as an anchorage method, 72,2% use the Delaire mask and 69,8% the headgear and 58,2 apply the Hawley plate as a contention mean. Conclusions: A very high percentage of resident, specialist and senior doctors utilize classical removable and functional appliances and methods.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective. To compare the conventional and self-ligating brackets systems from the point of view of the clinician. Material and methods. A survey was delivered to orthodontists from the international community (n = 130) in order to evaluate and compare different proprieties of the two systems. Results. Conventional brackets are preferred when it comes to bonding technique, final results from an aesthetic and functional point of view and quality-price ratio, while self-ligating brackets are elected for improved patient hygiene, less chairside time and reduced friction and global treatment time. Conclusions. Orthodontists currently use both systems in their practice and each of them has certain features which makes them superior in comparison to the other.