Background In China, diverticulitis is more often located in the right colon, mainly in the cecum and ascending colon. Here we study the characteristics of acute colonic diverticulitis and compare various treatments for acute right-sided colonic diverticulitis. Methods A retrospective analysis of 123 patients with acute colonic diverticulitis treated in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2020, including 114 cases of right-sided colonic diverticulitis, was performed. The characteristics of acute colonic diverticulitis were analyzed, and the therapeutic effects of different treatments for acute right-sided colonic diverticulitis were compared. Results 111 cases of caecal and ascending colonic diverticulitis were identified (90.2% of cases, male to female ratio 2.26:1, average age 39.6 ± 14.4 years, surgery ratio 24.3%, mean hospital stay 7.4 ± 4.3 days, recurrence rate 3.6%). Three cases of transverse colonic diverticulitis and three cases of descending colonic diverticulitis were found. Six cases of Sigmoid diverticulitis (4.9% of cases, male to female ratio 1:1, average age 67.7 ± 4.5 years, surgery ratio 33.3%, mean hospital stay 11.7 ± 5.5 days, recurrence rate 0%) were found. 13 patients underwent right-sided colonic diverticulitis resection and repair, while zero patients underwent colectomy. Abdominal drainage was performed in 15 patients with right-sided colonic diverticulitis. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay among the three treatments for right-sided colonic diverticulitis (P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate among the three treatments of right-sided colonic diverticulitis (P = 0.358). While the recurrence rate of right-sided colonic diverticulitis was only 3.5%, relapse usually occurred within the first year following treatment. Conclusions In our patients, right-sided colonic diverticulitis is more common in young and middle-aged patients than in elderly patients and we see a higher incidence in males. Acute right-sided complex diverticulitis is rare. While non-surgical treatment is preferred for acute right-sided uncomplicated diverticulitis, no significant difference in outcome was observed between the three different treatments we compared. Resection and repair of diverticulum or abdominal drainage can also be used to treat patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

In patients with primary canaliculitis, conservative medical therapy is associated with a high recurrence rate. Surgical treatments carry a great resolution rate but sometimes can result in the lacrimal pump dysfunction and canalicular scarring. The aim of this study is to introduce a minimally invasive approach, intracanalicular ophthalmic corticosteroid/antibiotic combination ointment infiltration (IOI, intracanalicular ointment infiltration), and to report our preliminary results for treating primary canaliculitis.In this retrospective, interventional case series, 68 consecutive patients with newly developed primary canaliculitis at a major tertiary eye center between January 2012 and January 2015. Thirty-six patients received conservative medical treatment alone (group 1; 36 eyes). Twenty-two patients and 10 medically uncontrolled patients from group 1 underwent IOI therapy (group 2; 32 eyes). Ten patients and 26 recurrent patients from group 1 and group 2 underwent surgery (group 3; 36 eyes). Patients were followed-up for at least 8 weeks. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared.In this study, patients’ age, sex, onset location, and durations of disease among 3 groups showed no significant difference. The resolution rate in group 2 was 72.7% (16/22) for new patients and 68.8% (22/32) for gross patients, respectively, both of which are higher than that of group 1 (22.2%, 10/36) but lower than that of group 3 (100%, 36/36). Of group 3, 2 patients received 2 surgical interventions and resolved finally. Microbiological workup was available in 51 patients. The most common isolates were staphylococcus species (27.9%) and streptococcus species (20%). Canalicular laceration developed in 1 patient during the IOI procedure and 1 patient undergoing surgery. Only 2 had postoperative lacrimal pump dysfunction and 1 had canalicular scarring in group 3.The IOI may be an effective and minimally invasive technique for treating primary canaliculitis and obviate the need for further intensive surgery.

To compare the surgical duration and clinical outcomes of nasolacrimal recanalization versus external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in the treatment of failed nasolacrimal duct intubation.This is a retrospective, comparative, and interventional study. We evaluated the outcomes of 66 consecutive patients undergoing either nasolacrimal recanalization (n = 32) or DCR (n = 34) in a tertiary lacrimal disease referral center. Length of surgical duration, clinical outcomes, and rate of recurrence at 18 months postoperatively were compared.The mean surgical duration was 18.5 minutes (range, 15–25 minutes) for nasolacrimal recanalization and 48.2 minutes (range, 45–61 minutes) for DCR, respectively (P < 0.001). The rate of success was 84.4% in the recanalization group and 85.3% in the DCR group, respectively (P = 0.91). The time to recurrence was 2.6 ± 1.1 months in the recanalization group and 5.6 ± 2.1 months in the DCR group (P < 0.001). Five failed cases in each group received a secondary DCR surgery with the same resolution rate (40%). The absence of ocular discharge at baseline was a significant predictor for a successful outcome in the recanalization group (P = 0.04) but not in the DCR group (P = 0.63).Nasolacrimal recanalization is an effective, safe, and time-saving alternative to DCR for the treatment of failed nasolacrimal duct intubation. Clinicians should be cautious in patients with discharge.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text