Corneal allotransplantation is the most common and successful form of solid organ transplantation in humans. In uncomplicated cases, the two-year graft survival rate is over 90%. This extraordinary success can be attributed in part to various features of the normal cornea and anterior segment that together account for their 'immune-privileged' status. However, despite this success, a significant number of corneal grafts fail and immunological rejection remains by far the leading cause of graft failure. Studies on animal models of corneal transplantation have yielded a wealth of information on the molecular and cellular features of graft rejection, and have established that this process is mediated primarily by CD4 + T cells of the T helper 1 (Th1) phenotype. In addition, studies have elucidated that certain facets of allosensitisation differ between corneal and other solid organ transplants. On the basis of these findings, novel experimental strategies selectively targeting the afferent or efferent arms of corneal alloimmunity have provided promising results in preventing corneal allograft rejection in the laboratory. Finally, because of the global shortage of human donor corneas, there is currently renewed interest in the possibility of using corneas from other species for transplantation into human eyes (xenotransplantation). Preliminary studies on animal models of corneal xenotransplantation have documented both antibody-mediated and cellmediated responses that might play important roles in the accelerated rejection observed in corneal xenotransplants. This review synthesises the principal concepts emerging from studies of the molecular mechanisms in corneal transplant immunology.
Prolonged survival seen in MHC-mismatched grafts in ICAM-1-/- mice, along with a suppressed DTH response to donor alloantigens after transplantation, suggest that ICAM-1 is associated with recipient sensitization to MHC alloantigens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.