Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder commonly caused by a traumatic event(s) and prevalent among service members and veterans. Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) is an emerging "mind-body" psychotherapy for PTSD that is generally briefer and less expensive than current first-line treatments, such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE) therapy.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the results of ART for treatment of military-related PTSD, with stratification by prior history of PTSD treatment, including refractory PTSD following receipt of guideline-driven first-line psychotherapy.
Methods: The study compares the PTSD treatment results of ART between (military service members and/or) veterans with a prior history of PTSD treatment (medication only, n=40; first-line psychotherapy, n=33; other psychotherapy, n=42) and a treatment-naive group (n=33). Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3- or 6-month follow-up using PCL-M scores (PTSD checklist).
Results: Mean age was 43.8 years, 95% male, 84% white race. The treatment completion rate was 72% with a mean of 3.5 treatment sessions. Within-group standardized effect sizes for pre-to-post changes in PTSD scores (PCL-M) were large at 1.11, 1.88, 1.03, and 1.48 for the medication only, first-line psychotherapy, other psychotherapy, and treatment-naive groups, respectively (p=0.02 for between-group comparison). Similar results were observed for measures of depression and anxiety, and baseline to follow-up results was generally similar.
Conclusions: In a brief treatment period, ART appears to result in substantial reductions in symptoms of PTSD among veterans, including those previously treated (unsuccessfully) with first-line psychotherapies endorsed by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Affairs (VA). These results suggest that ART be considered as a treatment modality for veterans with refractory PTSD.
Background
Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).
Results
A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point.”
Conclusions
The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.