We analyzed long-term follow-up data accumulated during an 8 year study of survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest. All patients included in this study were DURING THE PAST 15 years. the success of community-based systems for intervention in prehospital cardiac arrest has established a new population of patients -the survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest who require highly specialized medical attention because of the risk of recurrent cardiac arrest.`Survival after cardiac arrest can be measured in three distinct time frames: (1) from the onset of cardiac arrest to hospitalization, (2) from the period of initial in-hospital care to discharge, and (3) as long-term outcome in patients who have been discharged from the hospital. The earli- Presented in part at the 56th Scientific Sessions of The American Heart Association, Anaheim, CA. November, 1983. est available data were discouraging with respect to outcome in each of these periods: a 60% to 70% prehospital mortality rate, a 50% to 60% mortality rate in hospitalized patients (i.e., 10% to 15% of the total prehospital arrest population survived both prehospital and in-hospital care), and a 45% 24 month rate of recurrence of cardiac arrest among posthospital survivors.

Abnormal procainamide pharmacokinetics (prolonged half-life and decreased volume of distribution) and pharmacodynamics (decreased threshold for the suppression of premature ventricular complexes) have been suggested in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, or both. To better define procainamide kinetics, 37 patients in the acute care setting received intravenous procainamide (25 mg/min, median dose 750 mg) with peak and hourly blood samples taken over 6 hours. Compared with the 10 control patients, the 12 patients with acute myocardial infarction and the 15 patients with congestive heart failure had normal procainamide pharmacokinetics with respect to half-life (2.3 +/- 1.0, 2.5 +/- 0.9 and 2.6 +/- 0.8 hours, respectively), volume of distribution (1.9 +/- 0.7, 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.8 +/- 0.5 liters/kg, respectively), clearance (11.3 +/- 7.5, 9.3 +/- 3.6 and 9.1 +/- 3.5 ml/min per kg, respectively) and unbound drug fraction (66 +/- 9, 66 +/- 9 and 69 +/- 4%, respectively). Low thresholds for greater than 85% premature ventricular complex suppression were confirmed in these patients (median 4.7 micrograms/ml in patients with acute myocardial infarction and 3.3 micrograms/ml in patients with congestive heart failure). Thus, differences in the response of premature ventricular complexes to procainamide reflect electropharmacologic differences dependent on clinical setting rather than pharmacokinetic abnormalities. Furthermore, the reduction of procainamide dosing in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, based solely on prior kinetic data, may result in inappropriate antiarrhythmic therapy.

No abstract

Previous studies of outcome as a function of the initial electrophysiologic mechanisms recorded at the scene of prehospital cardiac arrest have demonstrated that bradyarrhythmias and asystole have the worst prognosis. In this report, our observations in bradyarrhythmic and asystolic arrests occurring from 1980 to 1982 are compared with those from 1975 to 1978. From 1980 to 1982, 61 (27%) of 225 cardiac arrest events meeting entry criteria for the study were bradyarrhythmic or asystolic. Only 2 (8%) of 24 patients with asystole and 1 (20%) of 5 patients with sinus bradycardia survived prehospital intervention. Only 1 of these 29 patients was discharged from the hospital alive. In contrast, 15 (47%) of 32 patients who presented with idioventricular rhythm at initial contact survived prehospital intervention and were hospitalized, and 8 (25%) of these 32 were ultimately discharged alive. When compared with the 1975 to 1978 patients with bradyarrhythmia and asystole, both prehospital survival (8 versus 30%, p less than 0.001) and survival after hospitalization (0 versus 15%, p less than 0.05) significantly improved, but the improvement occurred predominantly in the subgroup with idioventricular rhythm. Survivors within this subgroup tended to have a prompt response to prehospital pharmacologic interventions that were not available to the 1975 to 1978 group. The response was manifested by return to a sinus mechanism or increase in the rate of idioventricular rhythm. In conclusion, outcome has improved for a specific subgroup of victims of prehospital cardiac arrest with bradyarrhythmia or asystole; the improved outcome may relate to field interventions by rescue personnel at the scene of arrest but the mortality rate is still high.

No abstract