Background With the introduction of the novel COVID-19 vaccine, public hesitancy is being experienced with many turning to healthcare professionals for advice. As future physicians, medical students play a critical role in the public’s view of the vaccine. Objectives To determine the attitude of U.S. medical students toward mandating the COVID-19 vaccine to healthcare workers and patients, as well as whether their knowledge of the vaccine plays a role in their view. Methods The authors emailed a survey link to all U.S. medical schools with request to distribute it to their medical students. The survey remained open from 02/09/2021 to 03/15/2021 and included questions to determine the attitude of the medical students toward recommending the COVID-19 vaccine, and general knowledge questions about the vaccine. Chi square, Fisher’s exact test, and linear regression were conducted to determine associations between willingness to recommend the COVID-19 vaccine and general knowledge of the vaccine. Results Among the 1,899 responses from medical students representing 151 U.S. medical schools, 57.82% approved of making the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory to healthcare workers, and 16.27% approved of making it mandatory to patients. Additionally, those who tested most knowledgeable of the vaccine were less likely to approve of making the vaccine mandatory for patients (66.67% vs. 72.70). Those that tested most knowledgeable were also more likely to personally receive the vaccine (72.35% vs 62.99%) as opposed to those that tested the least knowledgeable who were less willing to personally receive the vaccine (4.12% vs 14.17%). Conclusions The data revealed that a slight majority of medical students support a vaccine mandate toward healthcare workers while a minority of medical students support a vaccine mandate toward healthcare workers. Additionally, medical students that had relatively high knowledge of the vaccine correlated with not approving of making the vaccine mandatory for patients. However increased knowledge of the vaccine correlated with increased willingness to personally receive the vaccine.

Summary: Morel-Lavallée lesions and traumatic abdominal wall hernias seldom present together and have no standardized guidelines for treatment. We present a unique case of a traumatic abdominal wall hernia present within a patient’s abdominal Morel-Lavallée lesion, which was reduced and repaired with a dermal autograft. This is a novel approach to repairing a rare and unusual injury. The literature suggests that tension-free repairs with mesh should be used on delayed repairs of traumatic abdominal wall hernias. However, some advocate for primary repairs due to an up to 50% increased risk of wound infection in these injuries, even without the use of mesh. Although infection rates with the use of biologic mesh (acellular dermal matrices) in a contaminated field are lower than that of synthetic mesh, infections still occur and tend to be higher in repairs without mesh. The lack of foreign material and innate immunogenicity of the patient’s own dermis may theoretically decrease the risk of infection compared with other commercially-available and biologically-derived products. The patient is a 47-year-old woman who was in a motor vehicle accident with prolonged extrication time. She was hospitalized for approximately 6 months due to extensive injuries, but had no further complications from her Morel-Lavallée lesion or repair of her traumatic abdominal wall hernia with her own dermis.

Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is a complication of pelvic inflammatory disease that is most commonly seen in sexually active females and seldom in pre-coitarchal adolescents. Initial treatment is generally parenteral antibiotics but often requires more invasive surgical procedures. We present the case of a 12-year-old, non-sexually active adolescent, with bilateral TOA who ultimately underwent a sterilizing bilateral salpingectomy and appendectomy for treatment.