Background Fidaxomicin, a narrow-spectrum antibiotic approved for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in adults, is associated with lower rates of recurrence than vancomycin; however, pediatric data are limited. This multicenter, investigator-blind, phase 3, parallel-group trial assessed the safety and efficacy of fidaxomicin in children. Methods Patients aged <18 years with confirmed CDI were randomized 2:1 to 10 days of treatment with fidaxomicin (suspension or tablets, twice daily) or vancomycin (suspension or tablets, 4 times daily). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. The primary efficacy end point was confirmed clinical response (CCR), 2 days after the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points included global cure (GC; CCR without CDI recurrence) 30 days after EOT (end of study; EOS). Plasma and stool concentrations of fidaxomicin and its active metabolite OP-1118 were measured. Results Of 148 patients randomized, 142 were treated (30 <2 years old). The proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events was similar with fidaxomicin (73.5%) and vancomycin (75.0%). Of 3 deaths in the fidaxomicin arm during the study, none were CDI or treatment related. The rate of CCR at 2 days after EOT was 77.6% (76 of 98 patients) with fidaxomicin and 70.5% (31 of 44) with vancomycin, whereas the rate of GC at EOS was significantly higher in participants receiving fidaxomicin (68.4% vs 50.0%; adjusted treatment difference, 18.8%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5%–35.3%). Systemic absorption of fidaxomicin and OP-1118 was minimal, and stool concentrations were high. Conclusions Compared with vancomycin, fidaxomicin was well tolerated and demonstrated significantly higher rates of GC in children and adolescents with CDI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02218372

No abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ASP8477 in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP).DesignEnriched enrollment randomized withdrawal.SettingCenters in Poland (four), Czech Republic (six), and the United Kingdom (two).SubjectsPatients aged 18 years or older with PNP resulting from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia.MethodsA four-week screening period followed by a single-blind period (six-day dose titration and three-week maintenance period with ASP8477 [20/30 mg BID]). Treatment responders (defined as a ≥30% decrease in the mean average daily pain intensity during the last three days of the single-blind period) were stratified by disease and randomized to receive placebo or continue ASP8477 during a three-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period. The primary end point was change in mean 24-hour average numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) from baseline to end of double-blind period.ResultsAmong 132 patients who enrolled, 116 entered the single-blind period and 63 (ASP8477, N = 31; placebo, N = 32) completed the double-blind period. There was no difference in mean 24-hour average NPRS score (P = 0.644) or in time-to-treatment failure (P = 0.485) between ASP8477 and placebo. During the single-blind period, 57.8% of patients were treatment responders. ASP8477 was well tolerated. During the single-blind period, 22% of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TEAE); during the double-blind period, 8% in the ASP8477 arm and 18% in the placebo arm experienced at least one TEAE.ConclusionsASP8477 was well tolerated in patients with PNP; however, ASP8477 did not demonstrate a significant treatment difference compared with placebo.

AimsTo investigate the tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of S-3304 in healthy volunteers treated with high doses of S-3304 for 28 days. MethodsThirty-two healthy volunteers were recruited. Four male and four female subjects were allocated to one of four doses (800 mg, 1600 mg, 2400 mg and 3200 mg). At each dose six volunteers took active medication and two volunteers took placebo in a double-blind fashion. Volunteers took a single dose on days 1 and 28 for pharmacokinetic purposes, and took twice daily doses from day 3-27. The pharmacokinetics of S-3304 and its hydroxy metabolites were evaluated. Tolerance was based on subjective adverse events, clinical examination, vital signs, ECG and laboratory tests including haematology and biochemistry profiles using CTC grading. ResultsDoses up to 2400 mg twice daily were generally well tolerated. At 3200 mg twice daily, five volunteers including one randomized to placebo were withdrawn from treatment mainly due to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Cmax of S-3304 on day 1, whose geometric mean and 95% confidence interval were 66.3 mg ml -1 (48.8, 90.0) for 800 mg, 82.6 mg ml -1 (69.3, 98.6) for 1600 mg, 89.5 mg ml -1 (79.5, 100.7) for 2400 mg, and 110.5 mg ml -1 (88.9, 137.7) for 3200 mg, respectively, was correlated with the log-transformed peak ALT (P < 0.0001 for male and P = 0.048 for female volunteers). ConclusionsIn healthy volunteers the maximum tolerated dose of S-3304 was 2400 mg twice daily. ALT elevation was the most frequent dose-limiting factor and was correlated with Cmax on day 1.

No abstract