this retrospective clinical study investigated the survival probability of avulsed and replanted permanent teeth in relation to functional healing, replacement and inflammatory resorption. The explorative data analysis included data from 36 patients and 49 replanted permanent teeth with a minimum observation time of 60 days; the patients were generally treated according to the current guidelines of the international Association of Dental traumatology at the university hospital in Munich, Germany, between 2004 and 2017. The mean observation period was 3.5 years. Functional healing was observed in 26.5% (N = 13/49) of the included avulsion cases. In comparison, replacement resorption affected 51.0% (N = 25/49) of the replanted teeth, of which 24.0% (N = 6/25) were lost over the course of years (mean, 6.1 years). In contrast, inflammatory resorption resulted in the early loss of all replanted teeth (mean, 1.7 years) and affected 22.5% (N = 11/49) of all the monitored teeth. Therefore, it can be concluded that tooth avulsion remains a severe dental injury with an unpredictable prognosis. This topic demands further fundamental research aiming to maintain and/or regenerate the periodontal ligament after tooth avulsion, particularly in association with non-physiological tooth rescue.are sparse [16][17][18][19][20] . Therefore, this retrospectively designed clinical study aimed to analyse the prognosis for avulsed and replanted permanent teeth regarding longevity and complications in relation to relevant influential variables, e.g., dry storage time, extra-alveolar storage time, storage media, splinting time, and time to initiation of root canal treatment. Materials and MethodsEthical approval. All the procedures in these studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The present study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty at the Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU) of Munich . Informed consent was obtained from each participant included in the study and/or their legal guardians. Scientific RepoRtS |(2020) 10:2841 | https://doi.

Objectives The objectives of this retrospective clinical study were to describe characteristics of crown fractures in permanent teeth and to investigate the survival of pulp vitality and restorations in uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures. Materials and methods This retrospective study collected information from patients suffering from dental trauma who were treated between January 2004 and June 2017. The study population consisted of 434 patients (253 males/181 females; mean age 20.7 years) with 489 uncomplicated and 127 complicated crown fractures. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to explore the data statistically. Results The mean observation time was 522 days. Uncomplicated crown fractures without luxation showed a higher success rate of 82.3% (345/419) than complicated crown fractures without luxation (72.3%, 73/101). An additional luxation in uncomplicated crown fractures resulted in significantly reduced success rates in terms of survival of the pulp and restoration. Direct restorations survived significantly better independent of the fracture mode than did adhesively reattached crown fragments. No superiority of mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide as pulp capping agent in complicated crown fractures was documented. Approximately 85.5% of all complications occurred within 2 years after the accident. Conclusion The treatment of crown fractures resulted mostly in successful outcomes and only a moderate number of complications were observed. Clinical relevance Primary dental management of crown fractures should follow recently published clinical guidelines, and close monitoring over at least 2 years seems to be justified.

Background/Aim When patients have saved tooth fragments in case of crown fractures, reattachment is considered as the treatment of choice. With respect to the need to provide clinical outcome data regarding adhesively reattached fragments, the aim of this practice‐based clinical study was to evaluate the survival of reattached fragments after crown fractures in permanent teeth. Materials and Methods Records from patients treated at Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University between 2004 and 2017 were analyzed to collect clinical and radiographic data regarding the management of fractured teeth that were treated with an adhesive reattachment. The study population consisted of 109 patients comprising 135 reattached fragments divided into uncomplicated (N = 84/135) and complicated (N = 51/135) crown fractures. The Kaplan‐Meier Survival estimator was used to estimate the survival probability of primary reattachments after uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures. Results Overall, 77.4% (N = 65/84) and 66.6% (N = 34/51) of the primarily applied reattachments in uncomplicated fractured teeth and complicated fractured teeth, respectively, survived over the period of observation. The survival rate for adhesive reattachment in all teeth was 84.4% (N = 114/135) after 608.2 days (±983.1 days). The data further suggest that in the case of a detachment, repeated reattachment might be a valuable restoration strategy. Conclusions Adhesive reattachment is a good first‐choice treatment option in cases of crown fractures when the fractured fragment has been saved.