Genome instability is a prerequisite for the development of cancer. It occurs when genome maintenance systems fail to safeguard the genome's integrity, whether as a consequence of inherited defects or induced via exposure to environmental agents (chemicals, biological agents and radiation). Thus, genome instability can be defined as an enhanced tendency for the genome to acquire mutations; ranging from changes to the nucleotide sequence to chromosomal gain, rearrangements or loss. This review raises the hypothesis that in addition to known human carcinogens, exposure to low dose of other chemicals present in our modern society could contribute to carcinogenesis by indirectly affecting genome stability. The selected chemicals with their mechanisms of action proposed to indirectly contribute to genome instability are: heavy metals (DNA repair, epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, telomere length), acrylamide (DNA repair, chromosome segregation), bisphenol A (epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation), benomyl (chromosome segregation), quinones (epigenetic modification) and nano-sized particles (epigenetic pathways, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation, telomere length). The purpose of this review is to describe the crucial aspects of genome instability, to outline the ways in which environmental chemicals can affect this cancer hallmark and to identify candidate chemicals for further study. The overall aim is to make scientists aware of the increasing need to unravel the underlying mechanisms via which chemicals at low doses can induce genome instability and thus promote carcinogenesis.
While regulatory requirements for carcinogenicity testing of chemicals vary according to product sector and regulatory jurisdiction, the standard approach starts with a battery of genotoxicity tests (which include mutagenicity assays). If any of the in vivo genotoxicity tests are positive, a lifetime rodent cancer bioassay may be requested, but under most chemical regulations (except plant protection, biocides, pharmaceuticals), this is rare. The decision to conduct further testing based on genotoxicity test outcomes creates a regulatory gap for the identification of non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTxC). With the objective of addressing this gap, in 2016, the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) established an expert group to develop an integrated approach to the testing and assessment (IATA) of NGTxC. Through that work, a definition of NGTxC in a regulatory context was agreed. Using the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept, various cancer models were developed, and overarching mechanisms and modes of action were identified. After further refining and structuring with respect to the common hallmarks of cancer and knowing that NGTxC act through a large variety of specific mechanisms, with cell proliferation commonly being a unifying element, it became evident that a panel of tests covering multiple biological traits will be needed to populate the IATA. Consequently, in addition to literature and database investigation, the OECD opened a call for relevant assays in 2018 to receive suggestions. Here, we report on the definition of NGTxC, on the development of the overarching NGTxC IATA, and on the development of ranking parameters to evaluate the assays. Ultimately the intent is to select the best scoring assays for integration in an NGTxC IATA to better identify carcinogens and reduce public health hazards.
DNA methylation is one of the epigenetic mechanisms that regulates gene expression, chromosome structure, and stability. Our objective was to determine whether the DNA methylation system could be a target following in utero and postnatal exposure to human blood contaminants. Pregnant rats were dosed daily from gestation day 1 until postnatal day 21 with 2 dose levels of either organochlorine pesticides (OCP; 0.019 or 1.9 mg/kg/day), methylmercury chloride (MeHg; 0.02 or 2 mg/kg/day), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs; 0.011 or 1.1 mg/kg/day), or a mixture (Mix; 0.05, or 5 mg/kg/day) including all 3 groups of chemicals. Livers from 1 female offspring per litter were collected at postnatal day 29. Hepatic analysis revealed that the mRNA abundance for DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-1, -3a, and -3b were significantly reduced by the high dose of PCB, that the high dose of MeHg also reduced mRNA levels for DNMT-1, and -3b, but that OCP had no significant effects compared with control. The high dose of PCB and Mix reduced the abundance of the universal methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine, and Mix also reduced global genome DNA methylation (5-methyl-deoxycytidine/5-methyl-deoxycytidine + deoxycytidine). The latter is consistent with pyrosequencing methylation analysis, revealing that the high-dose groups (except OCP) generally decreased the methylation of CpG sites (position -63 to -29) in the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene p16(INK4a). Overall, these hepatic results suggest that the DNA methylation system can be affected by exposure to high doses of blood contaminants, and that OCP is the least potent chemical group from the investigated mixtures.
Human populations throughout the world are exposed daily to low levels of environmental contaminants. The consequences of potential interactions of these compounds to human endocrine, reproductive, and immune function remain unknown. The current study examines the effects of subchronic oral exposure to a complex mixture of ubiquitous persistent environmental contaminants that have been quantified in human reproductive tissues. The dosing solution used in this study contained organochlorines (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD], polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs],p,p'-dichlorodiphenoxydichloroethylene [p,p'-DDE],p,p-dichlorodiphenoxytrichloroethane [p,p'-DDT], dieldrin, endosulfan, methoxychlor, hexachlorobenzene, and other chlorinated benzenes, hexachlorocyclohexane, mirex and heptachlor) as well as metals (lead and cadmium). Each chemical was included in the mixture at the minimum risk level (MRL) or tolerable daily intake (TDI) as determined by the U.S. EPA or ATSDR or, for TCDD, at the no observable effect level (NOEL) used to calculate the TDI. Sexually mature male rats were exposed to this complex mixture at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 times the estimated safe levels daily for 70 days. On day 71, all animals were sacrificed and a variety of physiological systems assessed for toxic effects. Evidence of hepatotoxicity was seen in the significant enlargement of the liver in the 1000x group, reduced serum LDH activity (100x), and increased serum cholesterol and protein levels (both 1000x). Hepatic EROD activities were elevated in animals exposed to10x and above. The mixture caused decreased proliferation of splenic T cells at the highest dose and had a biphasic effect on natural killer cell lytic activity with an initial increase in activity at 1x followed by a decrease to below control levels in response to 1000x. No treatment-related effects were seen on bone marrow micronuclei, daily sperm production, serum LH, FSH, or prolactin levels or weights of most organs of the reproductive tract. The weights of the whole epididymis and of the caput epididymis were significantly decreased at 10x and higher doses, although no effect was seen on cauda epididymal weight. The sperm content of the cauda epididymis was increased at the 1x level but not significantly different from control at higher dose levels. A slight, but significant, increase in the relative numbers of spermatids was seen in the animals from the 1000x group with a trend towards reduced proportion of diploid cells at the same dose. Only minor, nondose related changes were seen in parameters related to condensation of chromatin, as determined by flow cytometry, in epididymal sperm. We conclude that the mixture induced effects on the liver and kidney and on general metabolism at high doses but caused only minor effects on immune function, reproductive hormone levels, or general indices of reproductive function measures. These data suggest that additive or synergistic effects of exposure to contaminants resulting in residue levels representative of contemporar...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.