The objective of this study was to collect and interpret three-axis acceleration, temperature, and relative humidity data from six locations within commercial transport trailers shipping market-weight pigs. Transport was observed in Kansas (n = 15) and North Carolina (n = 20). Prior to loading, three-axis accelerometers were affixed to six locations on the trailers: top fore (TF), top center (TC), top aft (TA), bottom fore (BF), bottom center (BC), and bottom aft (BA) compartments. Data were post-processed to calculate root mean square (RMS) accelerations and vibration dose values (VDV) in the vertical direction and the horizontal plane. These values were compared to exposure action values (EAV) and exposure limit values (ELV), vibration levels deemed uncomfortable and potentially dangerous to humans. Additionally, RMS and VDV were compared among the trailer compartments. The vertical RMS accelerations for all compartments exceeded the EAV for loads measured in Kansas, and for the majority of the compartments measured in North Carolina. Many compartments, specifically the BA compartment from all trips, exceeded the vertical ELV. Regardless of where the data were collected, fewer compartments exceeded the EAV in the horizontal orientation. Only BA compartments exceeded the ELV in the horizontal orientation. There were Area × Level interactions for vertical and horizontal RMS and VDV (P < 0.01). The BF compartment had a greater vertical RMS value than the TF, TC, and BC (P < 0.02) compartments, but did not differ (P = 0.06) from the TA compartment. The vertical RMS of the TA compartment did not differ from the TF, TC, and BC compartments (P > 0.13). The BF compartment had a greater (P = 0.02) vertical VDV value than the TC location, but did not differ from the other locations (P > 0.16). All other locations did not differ in vertical VDV (P > 0.12). The BF compartment had greater horizontal RMS than the TC and TA compartments (P < 0.01), but did not differ from TF and BC compartments (P > 0.12). All other compartments did not differ in horizontal RMS (P > 0.34). All compartments, aside from the BA compartment, did not differ in horizontal VDV (P > 0.19). Vibration analyses indicated the BA compartment had the greatest vertical and horizontal vibrations and a large percentage of the compartments exceed the EAV and ELV, which indicated pigs may have experienced uncomfortable trips that could cause discomfort or fatigue.

HighlightsLaying the groundwork for AGV mobility models for high slope terrain operations.AGV drawbar pull performance was evaluated on a level terrain, uphill, and downhill slopes up to 18° on a soil bin.AGV generates the optimum power efficiency with enough drawbar pull to perform a range of agricultural operations on uphill and downhill slopes up to 18°.Explored the suitability and established the boundary conditions of small size ground vehicles on the high slope farming.Generated sloped traction data would empower the multi-AGV system on sloped terrain.Abstract. Excessive steepness of grasslands, hills, or uneven terrain presents difficulties for farming with large conventional equipment. Therefore, a fleet of Autonomous Ground Vehicles (AGV) is proposed to perform primary agricultural operations on high sloped hills or terrain. However, it is imperative to understand how an individual AGV functions on sloping terrain under varying load and speed. Hence, this study aims to investigate the traction, mobility, and energy consumption characteristics of AGV on a sloped soil bin environment. A drawbar pull performance of the prototype AGV was evaluated on a level terrain and variable slope of 10° and 18°, both uphill and downhill, at varying drawbar pull (P) and AGV speed. The AGV’s performance metrics include power efficiency (PE), travel reduction (TR), and power number (PN) which relates to AGV’s traction, mobility, and energy usage, respectively. The AGV generated drawbar pull equivalent to its weight only on downhill run for reduced PE. On a level terrain (0°), the peak PE was 0.20 and was found to be 108.3% and 328.6% higher on 10° and 18° downhill run than uphill with 55.5% and 133% increase in drawbar pull, respectively. Both applied drawbar pull and uphill operation caused the AGV’s TR. The TR, corresponding to a peak PE, increased from 10% to 30%, respectively, on 0° and both 10° and 18° uphill. The optimum values of power number ranged from 2 to 4. The AGV delivers the optimum PE and generates enough drawbar pull with an optimum TR to perform a range of agricultural operations on a slope up to 18°. This study explored the suitability and established the boundary conditions of small size ground vehicles for high-sloped farming. Besides this, the study also aims to generate an AGV’s slope traction database to optimize its control variables, design optimization, and develop a mobility model for sloped terrain. Keywords: Drawbar pull, Ground vehicle, Multi-AGV fleet, Power efficiency, Slope, Travel reduction.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract