Background: The degree of heterotypic immunity induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains is a major determinant of the spread of emerging variants and the success of vaccination campaigns, but remains incompletely understood.Methods: We examined the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 (Alpha) that arose in the United Kingdom and spread globally. We determined titres of spike glycoprotein-binding antibodies and authentic virus neutralising antibodies induced by B.1.1.7 infection to infer homotypic and heterotypic immunity.Results: Antibodies elicited by B.1.1.7 infection exhibited significantly reduced recognition and neutralisation of parental strains or of the South Africa variant B.1.351 (Beta) than of the infecting variant. The drop in cross-reactivity was significantly more pronounced following B.1.1.7 than parental strain infection.Conclusions: The results indicate that heterotypic immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 variants is asymmetric.
We examined the immunogenicity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant B.1.1.7 that arose in the United Kingdom and spread globally. Antibodies elicited by B.1.1.7 infection exhibited significantly reduced recognition and neutralisation of parental strains or of the South Africa B.1.351 variant, than of the infecting variant. The drop in cross-reactivity was more pronounced following B.1.1.7 than parental strain infection, indicating asymmetric heterotypic immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a clinically defined illness estimated to
affect millions of people worldwide causing significant morbidity and an annual
cost of billions of dollars. Currently there are no laboratory-based diagnostic
methods for CFS. However, differences in gene expression profiles between CFS
patients and healthy persons have been reported in the literature. Using mRNA
relative quantities for 44 previously identified reporter genes taken from a
large dataset comprising both CFS patients and healthy volunteers, we derived a
gene profile scoring metric to accurately classify CFS and healthy samples. This
metric out-performed any of the reporter genes used individually as a classifier
of CFS.To determine whether the reporter genes were robust across populations, we
applied this metric to classify a separate blind dataset of mRNA relative
quantities from a new population of CFS patients and healthy persons with
limited success. Although the metric was able to successfully classify roughly
two-thirds of both CFS and healthy samples correctly, the level of
misclassification was high. We conclude many of the previously identified
reporter genes are study-specific and thus cannot be used as a broad CFS
diagnostic.
Background:
TRIP (Transmission Reduction Intervention Project) was a network-based, contact tracing approach to locate and link to care, mostly people who inject drugs (PWID) with recent HIV infection.
Objective:
We investigated whether sequences from HIV-infected participants with high viral load cluster together more frequently than what is expected by chance.
Methods:
Paired end reads were generated for 104 samples using Illumina MiSeq next-generation se-quencing.
Results:
63 sequences belonged to previously identified local transmission networks of PWID (LTNs) of an HIV outbreak in Athens, Greece. For two HIV-RNA cut-offs (105 and 106 IU/mL), HIV transmissions were more likely between PWID with similar levels of HIV-RNA (p<0.001). 10 of the 14 sequences (71.4%) from PWID with HIV-RNA >106 IU/mL were clustered in 5 pairs. For 4 of these clusters (80%), there was in each one of them at least one sequence from a recently HIV-infected PWID.
Conclusion:
We showed that transmissions are more likely among PWID with high viremia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.