Background Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of percutaneous structural heart disease interventions have been described in previous years, reflecting significant gaps. However, it is unclear if increased awareness has created meaningful changes in the utilization of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in underrepresented populations. Purpose We aim to further clarify current practices in the United States and answer questions to help guide further efforts in attenuating health disparities. Methods The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried from 2016–2019 to identify all patients >65 years of age diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the international classification of diseases, tenth revision clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. We selected this age cutoff to minimize confounding bias from lack of insurance coverage as patients age 65 and older qualify for the Center of Medicare & Medicaid Services. We excluded patients with missing race information. In addition, we confined our analysis to patients of White, Black, and Hispanic ethnicity because the number of other races was insufficient for meaningful analysis. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the odds of procedure utilization, in-hospital mortality, and significant periprocedural complications among study groups. Results We identified a total of 14,103,690 patients >65 years of age diagnosed with either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Of those, 53,350 (0.38%) underwent LAAO. The mean age of the sample was 79±7.6 years. Compared to White patients, Black patients had lesser odds of undergoing LAAO when controlling for multiple confounders (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.44–0.55, p<0.001). Among Hispanic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in the odds of undergoing LAAO compared to White patients. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, vascular complications, non-home discharge, stroke, transient ischemic attack, pericardial tamponade, and length of stay in patients undergoing LAAO among different ethnicities. Conclusions Significant disparities, including procedure utilization and patient characteristics prior to the procedure, such as household income, still exist among Black patients compared to White patients undergoing the LAAO in the United States. Nevertheless, adjusted odds of in-hospital outcomes were similar among Black, Hispanic, and White patients. Further research is necessary to identify what mitigation strategies could be effective and what can be changed to close the remaining gap. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that patients with heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have worse outcomes when admitted over the weekend. Since peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a cause of CS and persisting HF, it is reasonable to extrapolate that admission over the weekend would also have deleterious effects on PPCM outcomes. However, the impact of weekend admission has not been specifically evaluated in patients with PPCM. MethodsWe analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. The International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) codes were used to identify all admissions with a primary diagnosis of PPCM. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend groups. We performed a multivariate regression analysis to estimate the effect of weekend admission on specified outcomes. ResultsA total of 6,120 admissions met the selection criteria, and 25.3% (n=1,550) were admitted over the weekend. The mean age was 31.3 ± 6.4 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between study groups. After multivariate analysis, weekend admission for PPCM was not associated with in-hospital mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, thromboembolic events, cardiovascular implantable electronic device placement, and mechanical circulatory support insertion. ConclusionIn conclusion, although HF and CS have been associated with worse outcomes when admitted over the weekend, we did not find weekend admission for PPCM to be independently associated with worse clinical outcomes after multivariate analysis. These findings could reflect improvement in the coordination of care over the weekend, improvement in physician handoff, and increased utilization of shock teams.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for the treatment of selected patients with moderate-severe or severe primary MR. Despite a lack of a universal definition, frailty has been associated with poor post-procedural outcomes. Albeit several trials have examined individual prognostic factors in this population, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of frailty on in-hospital outcomes after TMVr. Purpose To further elucidate the association of frailty with in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing TMVr. Methods The national inpatient sample (NIS) database, which is part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), was queried from 2016 to 2019 to identify all who underwent TMVr. International classification of diseases, tenth revision clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) codes were used to divide patients into frail and non-frail study groups. Frailty was defined using Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups diagnosis cluster for frailty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to compare in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, non-home discharge, and iatrogenic cardiac complications among Frail and Non-Frail groups. Results A total of 30,660 patients who underwent TMVr were identified. The mean age was 76±11.6 years. Of those, 2,950 (9.6%) were identified as frail. The overall in-hospital mortality rate for the entire study population was 1.89%. Compared to non-frail patients, those identified as frail had greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR= 2.13, 95% CI 1.29–3.51, p<0.001) and non-home discharge (AOR= 4.34, 95% CI 3.54–5.32, p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in hospital length of stay and rates of iatrogenic cardiac complications. Conclusions Frailty models continue to be underutilized as a prognostic tool in clinical practice. After following HCUP guidelines, our analysis found that frailty is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality and non-home discharge in patients undergoing TMVr. Therefore, we recommend that further efforts in incorporating frailty models in the pre-procedural assessment of patients undergoing TMVr should be sought along with a standardized predictive model for defining frailty. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.