In contrast to artificial sweeteners, there are no reported negative health consequences of Stevia, such as toxicity, teratogenicity, mutagenicity or carcinogenicity. In contrast, the anti-hyperglycemic, antioxidant and antihypertensive properties of stevioside have been well documented, suggesting a potential medicinal use as an adjunctive treatment for several diseases. Anti-hyperglycemic PropertiesStevia glycosides have been widely shown to prevent weight gain and decrease serum glucose levels in animal and human models. As with any zero-calorie sweetener, stevia lacks calories and reduces serum glucose levels that typically rise about 1 hour after carbohydrate consumption, compared to sucrose. However, a 2010 study by Kujur et al. found that stevia significantly reduces mean serum glucose levels in subjects over a 1-month period. The study used Wister rats with diabetes induced by 5% alloxan monohydrate, and found that administering 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg of stevia daily resulted in significant time-dependent anti-hyperglycemic effects. When treated with 50 mg/kg of stevia in the aqueous, ether and methanolic extracts for 28 days, mean serum glucose levels fell from 220 to 161 mg/dL; 220 to 171 mg/dL; and 232to 163mg/dL, respectively. When treated with 100 mg/kg of the stevia extracts, mean serum glucose levels fell from 220 to 137 mg/dL; 209 to 168 mg/dL; and 218 to 181 mg/dL, respectively. There were non-significant differences in serum glucose levels between the 50mg/kg and 100mg/kg doses. Rats administered glyburide, a known oral diabetes medication that was used as a positive control, hada reduction in mean serum glucose levels from 211 to 101 mg/dL after 28 days. Thus, the administration of stevia
Objectives Many CKD/ESKD pts rely on SNAP benefits to help offset the cost of food. We studied the association of SNAP benefits with food insecurity and dietary habits in our inner-City population. Methods A face-to-face survey was conducted with a sample of patients from inner-city CKD (23), dialysis (24), and transplant (33) clinics. As SNAP usage was similar across all clinics data were pooled. Diet was assessed using 24-hour recall and analyzed using ASA24 software. The Healthy Eating Index was scored using the HEI-15, with a value below 50 considered poor. Food security was evaluated using the question “In the last 12 months did you ever eat less than you think you should because there wasn't enough money for food?”. All comparisons were by t-test except where noted. Results Mean age was 54.7 ± 1.7. There were 46 (58%) men and 34 (42%) women with 65 Black, 5 Asian, 5 Hispanic, and 4 others. 34 people (42.5%) had an income < $20 K, with 22 (27.4%) between $20 K and 40 K. 21 (26.3%) were employed. 42 people (44.2%) participated in SNAP in the last year and 53 (55.8%) did not. There was no significant difference in age, gender, years in the US, or education level between the SNAP recipients (SNAP-Y) and those who did not receive. SNAP-Y were less likely to be employed (10% vs 39%, P < 0.5 by Chi square) and reported more food insecurity (23% vs 2%, P = 0.007 by Chi-square). SNAP-Y ate a poorer diet by HEI (53.0 ± 7.2 vs 59.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.015), ate less fiber (11.5 ± 6.9 vs 15.5 ± 1.04, P = 0.009), less magnesium (234 ± 16.9 vs 298 ± 23.8, P = 0.05), less vitamin C (54.9 ± 9.4 vs 99.1 ± 16.6, P = 0.025), fewer total vegetables (1.15 ± 0.25 vs 1.77 ± 0.18, P < 0.05), and fewer dark green leafy vegetables (0.4 ± 0.5 vs 0.5 ± 0.12, P = 0.009). There was no difference in intake of total calories, sodium, protein, fat or total carbohydrate intake. Conclusions In our population: 1. Patients who received SNAP benefits reported more food insecurity. 2. All patients had poor adherence to Dietary Guidelines but SNAP recipients were worse, ate less fiber, magnesium and vitamin C and ate fewer vegetables, including dark green leafy vegetables. 3. As data suggest that plant-based eating may be advantageous for patients with kidney disease, and most Greenmarkets in our neighborhood take SNAP, these latter findings are particularly concerning and warrant further study to discern if this is an issue of cost or education. Funding Sources None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.