Habitat fragmentation may adversely affect the ability of natural enemies to control pest outbreaks in agricultural landscapes by interfering with their search behavior and ability to aggregate in response to prey. We determined how landscape structure affected the ability of two ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to track aphid populations in experimental landscapes that differed in the abundance and degree of fragmentation of red clover (Trifolium pratense). One coccinellid was a native species (Coleomegilla maculata Pallas) and the other (Harmonia axyridis Timberlake) was introduced specifically for the biological control of crop pests such as pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris; Homoptera: Aphididae).Landscape structure exhibited a threshold in lacunarity (a measure of interpatch distances) below 20% habitat, at which point clover patches became significantly more isolated. This threshold in landscape structure was mirrored by a similar threshold in the distribution of pea aphid populations. The distribution of the biocontrol agent, H. axyridis, tracked this threshold in aphid distribution, but the native coccinellid, C. maculata, was unable to do so in fragmented clover landscapes. Although C. maculata was a more active forager within clover cells, overall it was less mobile and moved significantly less among clover cells and between landscapes than H. axyridis, which may have contributed to its inability to track aphid populations in fragmented landscapes. The two coccinellids did not differ in their search success within fragmented landscapes, however, and it was only in clumped landscapes that H. axyridis maximized search success and foraged within clover cells that had 2.5-3 times more aphids than those in which C. maculata occurred.Thus, the potential of predators to control pest populations in fragmented landscapes may ultimately reflect the extent to which thresholds in landscape structure interfere with the aggregative response of predators. In this system, the aggregative response of coccinellids was more closely tied to thresholds in the distribution of clover than aphids. With its greater mobility, H. axyridis was more effective than the indigenous C. maculata at tracking aphids when they occurred at low patch occupancy (below the threshold in landscape structure), which is a requisite for successful biocontrol. If native insect predators are generally more sensitive to habitat fragmentation, greater reliance may be placed on the introduction of exotic species for biocontrol, which is not without economic cost and potential ecological impacts to native insect communities. Our study demonstrates that, in addition to economic thresholds, there are also ecological thresholds that must be surmounted if biocontrol measures are to be successful. In addition to enhancing vegetational diversity within agroecosystems, conservation biological control should also strive to mitigate fragmentation effects on natural enemies, especially if thresholds in landscape structure disrupt predator-prey int...
Habitat fragmentation may adversely affect the ability of natural enemies to control pest outbreaks in agricultural landscapes by interfering with their search behavior and ability to aggregate in response to prey. We determined how landscape structure affected the ability of two ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to track aphid populations in experimental landscapes that differed in the abundance and degree of fragmentation of red clover (Trifolium pratense). One coccinellid was a native species (Coleomegilla maculata Pallas) and the other (Harmonia axyridis Timberlake) was introduced specifically for the biological control of crop pests such as pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris; Homoptera: Aphididae). Landscape structure exhibited a threshold in lacunarity (a measure of interpatch distances) below 20% habitat, at which point clover patches became significantly more isolated. This threshold in landscape structure was mirrored by a similar threshold in the distribution of pea aphid populations. The distribution of the biocontrol agent, H. axyridis, tracked this threshold in aphid distribution, but the native coccinellid, C. maculata, was unable to do so in fragmented clover landscapes. Although C. maculata was a more active forager within clover cells, overall it was less mobile and moved significantly less among clover cells and between landscapes than H. axyridis, which may have contributed to its inability to track aphid populations in fragmented landscapes. The two coccinellids did not differ in their search success within fragmented landscapes, however, and it was only in clumped landscapes that H. axyridis maximized search success and foraged within clover cells that had 2.5–3 times more aphids than those in which C. maculata occurred. Thus, the potential of predators to control pest populations in fragmented landscapes may ultimately reflect the extent to which thresholds in landscape structure interfere with the aggregative response of predators. In this system, the aggregative response of coccinellids was more closely tied to thresholds in the distribution of clover than aphids. With its greater mobility, H. axyridis was more effective than the indigenous C. maculata at tracking aphids when they occurred at low patch occupancy (below the threshold in landscape structure), which is a requisite for successful biocontrol. If native insect predators are generally more sensitive to habitat fragmentation, greater reliance may be placed on the introduction of exotic species for biocontrol, which is not without economic cost and potential ecological impacts to native insect communities. Our study demonstrates that, in addition to economic thresholds, there are also ecological thresholds that must be surmounted if biocontrol measures are to be successful. In addition to enhancing vegetational diversity within agroecosystems, conservation biological control should also strive to mitigate fragmentation effects on natural enemies, especially if thresholds in landscape structure disrupt predator–prey in...
Habitat area and fragmentation are confounded in many ecological studies investigating fragmentation effects. We thus devised an innovative experiment founded on fractal neutral landscape models to disentangle the relative effects of habitat area and fragmentation on arthropod community patterns in red clover (Trifolium pratense). The conventional approach in experimental fragmentation studies is to adjust patch size and isolation to create different landscape patterns. We instead use fractal distributions to adjust the overall amount and fragmentation of habitat independently at the scale of the entire landscape, producing different patch properties. Although habitat area ultimately had a greater effect on arthropod abundance and diversity in this system, we found that fragmentation had a significant effect in clover landscapes with ≤40 % habitat. Landscapes at these lower habitat levels were dominated by edge cells, which had fewer arthropods and lower richness than interior cells. Fragmentation per se did not have a direct effect on local-scale diversity, however, as demonstrated by the lack of a broader landscape effect (in terms of total habitat area and fragmentation) on arthropods within habitat cells. Fragmentation-through the creation of edge habitat-thus had a strong indirect effect on morphospecies richness and abundance at the local scale. Although it has been suggested that fragmentation should be important at low habitat levels (≤20-30 %), we show that fragmentation per se is significant only at intermediate (40 %) levels of habitat, where edge effects were neither too great (as at lower levels of habitat) nor too weak (as at higher levels of habitat).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.