Summary In urgent clinical situations, such as trauma, urgent surgery or before thrombolysis, rapid quantification of direct oral anticoagulant plasma drug levels is warranted. Using the ClotPro® analyser, we assessed two novel viscoelastic tests for detection of clinically‐relevant plasma drug levels in trauma patients. The ecarin clotting time was used to assess the plasma concentration of dabigatran and Russell´s viper venom clotting time to determine the plasma concentration of direct factor Xa inhibitors. In parallel, plasma concentrations were analysed using plasma‐based chromogenic assays. A total of 203 simultaneous measurements were performed. Strong to very strong linear correlations were detected between ecarin clotting time and plasma concentration of dabigatran (r = 0.9693), and between Russell´s viper venom clotting time and plasma concentrations of apixaban (r = 0.7391), edoxaban (r = 0.9251) and rivaroxaban (r = 0.8792), all p < 0.001. An ecarin clotting time ≥ 189 seconds provided 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting plasma dabigatran concentrations ≥ 50 ng.ml‐1. Corresponding Russell´s viper venom clotting time cut‐off values were ≥ 136 seconds for apixaban (80% sensitivity, 88% specificity), ≥ 168 seconds for edoxaban (100% sensitivity, 100% specificity) and ≥ 177 seconds for rivaroxaban (90% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Detection of drug levels ≥ 100 ng.ml‐1 was also investigated: for dabigatran, an ecarin clotting time ≥ 315 seconds yielded 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity; while Russell´s viper venom clotting time cut‐offs of 191, 188 and 196 seconds were calculated for apixaban (67% sensitivity, 88% specificity), edoxaban (100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) and rivaroxaban (100% sensitivity, 91% specificity), respectively. We have demonstrated strong positive correlations between plasma drug levels and clotting time values in the specific ClotPro assays. Cut‐off values for detecting clinically‐relevant drug levels showed high levels of sensitivity and specificity.
BACKGROUND Many trauma centres have adopted the administration of fixed ratios of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for bleeding patients. However, the haemostatic efficacy of this concept is not well proven. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to characterise the haemostatic profile of different ratios (2 : 1 : 1, 1 : 1 : 1 and 1 : 1 : 2) of PRBCs, platelet concentrates and FFP in comparison with coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen and/or prothrombin complex concentrate). DESIGN An in vitro study. SETTING Research laboratories of the department of transfusion medicine, Linz, Austria. MATERIALS Whole blood donations from a total of 20 male volunteers. INTERVENTION Reconstitution of blood at different ratios of PRBCs, platelet concentrates and FFP or coagulation factor concentrates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cell count, conventional and thromboelastometric coagulation parameters, single coagulation factor activities as well as endogenous thrombin potential. RESULTS Fibrinogen levels and haematocrit were lower in the FFP group at any ratio compared with the concentrate-based groups (P < 0.0001). Reconstitution of blood with FFP at different ratios resulted in haematocrit or fibrinogen levels that were borderline with regard to recommended substitution triggers (haematocrit 41 ± 2% and fibrinogen 1.5 ± 0.3 g l−1 at the 2 : 1 : 1 ratio vs. 21 ± 1% and 2.1 ± 0.4 g l−1 respectively at the 1 : 1 : 2 ratio). Compared with FFP at any ratio, maximum clot firmness showed higher values in the groups using fibrinogen concentrate (P < 0.0001), whereas endogenous thrombin potential revealed higher values in the groups using prothrombin complex concentrate (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Use of coagulation factor concentrates for the reconstitution of blood allows for delivery of a higher haematocrit and a higher fibrinogen content compared with FFP. However, prothrombin complex concentrate might result in an unnecessary excess of thrombin generation. Clinical studies are warranted to further investigate these in vitro findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.