We are developing segmented magnetic nanowires (MNWs) as a new platform for highly specific biolabels. We found that cancer cells internalize MNWs and package them into exosomes, which are then secreted for several days. These MNWs thus enable magnetic isolation of exosomes, which could prove useful in future diagnosis. Our immediate goals are to study how cells internalize MNWs, to determine the timing and reproducibility of exosome secretion, and to improve the magnetic isolation of exosomes. Following this work, we aim to use ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) to identify specific MNW biolabels, similar to radio frequency identification (RFID). In this study, we incubated osteosarcoma (OSCA-8) cells with Fe/Au segmented MNWs with and without PEG coating for 48 hours. Internalization of MNWs as a function of concentration (5-40 µg/ml) was followed by fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We obtained quantitative estimates of MNW internalization by magnetic measurements. Our experiments indicated better internalization of the MNWs using PEG as a capping agent. As we increased the concentration of MNWs, both the number of cells with MNWs and the number of MNWs per cell increased. TEM images show that after uptake by cancer cells, MNWs were predominantly located within lysosomes, and they appeared to be fragmented into small segments of similar size as exosomes. These segments were mostly composed of either Fe or Au, suggesting that fragmentation occurred at or near the boundary of segments. We used two different methods for exosome isolation: non-magnetic isolation (centrifuge and ExoQuick TC) as a control and magnetic isolation. We incubated OSCA-8 cells with different concentrations of MNWs (0 to 35 µg/ml), and exosomes were isolated for up to 11 days. We analyzed the exosome size distribution using a nanoparticle tracking analyzer (NanoSight) and found that exosomes isolated magnetically had similar size distributions as those isolated non-magnetically. A minimum concentration of 25 µg/ml MNWs in 3×105 cells was required for appreciable magnetic isolation. Increasing the concentration of MNWs progressively; however, isolated microvesicles that had wider and more heterogeneous size distributions. Next, we successfully identified two different types of MNW biolabels by FMR. MNWs were fixed in a polymer that was placed onto an RFID chip. Each type of MNW exhibited a unique RF signature as the sample was exposed to an external magnetic field. Our preliminary data show that MNWs appear to allow fast, inexpensive magnetic exosome isolation and is our future goal is MNW identification of exosomes. The methodology developed in this study should be transferable to develop comparable approaches to isolate and identify exosomes from virtually any type of cell. Citation Format: Zohreh Nemati, Thomas Gage, Mohammad Reza Zamani Kouhpanji, Joseph Um, Alicia Donnelly, Daniel Shore, Kelly Makielski, Yali Zhang, Rhonda Franklin, Jaime F. Modiano, Bethanie J. Stadler. Magnetic isolation and identification of exosomes using Fe/Au nanowires [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1341.
Over the past fifteen years the letters WWJD? and the question they abbreviate, what would Jesus do? have become prominent features of American culture, appearing on book covers, buttons, bracelets, blue jeans, board games, bumper stickers, teddy bears, T-shirts, ties, key chains, coffee mugs, pencils, and even women's underwear. (This last item is truly a complex cultural artifact; is it worn by the devout or the derisive, to deter seducer or seducee, and by aesthetic or ethical deterrence?) In more recent years, the question has given rise to scores of spin-offs, devout and derisive alike. The "Who Would Jesus Vote For?" website, wwjv4.com, is a selfdescribed "progressive political blog that highlights the infringement of religion upon today's government." Those seeking a "Christian nutrition handbook" need look no further than What Would Jesus Eat? which bills itself as a "healthier, Bible-based eating program." 1 (Think water, bread, and lots of fish.) The Evangelical Environmental Network, a progressive evangelical group, launched the "What Would Jesus Drive?" ad campaign in 2002; now the question appears on bumpers across the nation. 2 Parodic spin-offs of WWJD? sometimes retain the moral aims of the original. Antiwar protesters, for example, hold up signs that read "Who Would Jesus Bomb?" But another popular variety of spin-off, in which Jesus' name is replaced with another name (usually that of a popular athlete), is markedly less rich in satire and ethical intent. Few have received
Challenging the conventional view of John Milton as an iconoclast who spoke only to a "fit audience though few," Daniel Shore argues that Milton was a far more pragmatic writer than previous scholarship has recognized. Summoning evidence from nearly all of his works-poetry and prose alike-Shore asserts that Milton distanced himself from the prescriptions of classical rhetoric to develop new means of persuasion suited to an age distrustful of traditional eloquence. He demonstrates that Milton's renunciation of agency, audience, purpose, and effect in the prose tracts leads not to quietism or withdrawal, but rather to a reasserted investment in public debate. Shore reveals a writer who is committed to persuasion and yet profoundly critical of his own persuasive strategies. An innovative contribution to the field, this text will appeal to scholars of Milton, seventeenth-century literature, Renaissance literature, and the history and theory of rhetoric. Daniel Shore is Assistant Professor of English at Georgetown University. His work has appeared in journals such as PMLA, Critical Inquiry, and Milton Studies. In 2006, the Milton Society of America awarded him the James Holly Hanford Award for "Most Distinguished Essay" of the year. He earned his Ph.D. and master's degrees from Harvard University.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.