Avian influenza has three of the four properties necessary to cause a pandemic. However, are we as individuals and communities prepared for a pandemic flu in the United States? To help answer this question, 12 focus groups (N = 60) were conducted in Tulsa, Oklahoma, to determine the level of awareness of avian and pandemic flu for the county health department to develop effective communication messages. The overall findings indicate that the general Tulsa public lacks information about avian influenza or pandemics, does not believe a pandemic will occur, and believes if one does occur the government will take care of it. Finally, the groups agreed that education would be the key to preventing widespread panic if a pandemic occurred. Five themes emerged: confusion about terminology, seriousness of avian influenza, disaster fatigue, appropriate precautions, and credibility of health information. Each should be considered in developing effective risk communication messages.

This article reports the results of a study of people's perceptions and reactions to a hypothetical terrorist attack involving a chemical agent (specifically, the nerve agent VX). Thirteen focus groups composed of 8 to 12 participants each were conducted using trained moderators. To achieve a broad representation of perspectives, the groups were conducted in several regions and included urban and rural locations. In addition, a variety of population groups, such as African Americans, Hispanics, American Indians, Asians, and people with English as a second language, were included in the study. Findings demonstrated fear, fatalism, and unfulfilled information needs related to the threat agent. To better prepare the public for VX threats or threats from other highly toxic chemical agents, it will be important to emphasize that VX exposure can be avoided or reduced, that VX effects can be treated, and that VX can be survived if appropriate protective measures are taken. Related findings from the focus groups are that participants preferred television, radio, and the Emergency Alert System for emergency messages and that people prefer to hear information about a chemical attack from a well-known, well-respected public figure or from a content expert on chemical attacks, protective actions, and health. In addition, local television meteorologists were identified as a category of trusted conveyers of important information in relation to chemical terrorist attacks.

This study assessed environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposures of nonsmoking musicians in nightclub environments using total suspended particulate (TSP), the ultraviolet absorbing fraction of TSP (UVPM), gaseous nicotine, saliva nicotine, saliva cotinine, and perceived smokiness as exposure/dose indicators. Measured exposures were as high or higher than those of other occupational groups studied. TSP ranged from 110 to 1714 micrograms/m3 (mean 502, SD 390 micrograms/m3). UVPM (mean 221, SD 95 micrograms/m3) was associated with gaseous and saliva nicotine concentrations. Paired-sample variation was much higher for TSP than for UVPM. Correlation of TSP with UVPM, gaseous nicotine, and saliva nicotine was poor. Paired-sample gaseous nicotine results were similar, with exposures of 28.0 to 50.0 micrograms/m3 (mean 37.1, SD 6.9 micrograms/m3), and were high compared with previous studies. These results suggested that nightclub musicians may be exposed to higher concentrations of ETS than some other occupational groups. Saliva nicotine results were consistent with those previously reported with regard to the range of values, large variation observed, and increase in saliva nicotine levels observable after only a few hours of exposure. Saliva nicotine results could not be correlated with other measures of exposure and did not appear to be a reliable biological indicator of absorbed dose. Saliva cotinine levels were comparable to other occupational groups studied, but were lower than previous findings for bartenders and waitresses. Levels ranged from 1.7 to 5.0 ng/mL (mean 3.4, SD 0.9 ng/mL), and increased with number of exposures during the workweek, but did not correlate with other ETS indicators.

No abstract