Let P be a d-dimensional n-point set. A Tverberg-partition of P is a
partition of P into r sets P_1, ..., P_r such that the convex hulls conv(P_1),
..., conv(P_r) have non-empty intersection. A point in the intersection of the
conv(P_i)'s is called a Tverberg point of depth r for P. A classic result by
Tverberg implies that there always exists a Tverberg partition of size n/(d+1),
but it is not known how to find such a partition in polynomial time. Therefore,
approximate solutions are of interest.
We describe a deterministic algorithm that finds a Tverberg partition of size
n/4(d+1)^3 in time d^{O(log d)} n. This means that for every fixed dimension we
can compute an approximate Tverberg point (and hence also an approximate
centerpoint) in linear time. Our algorithm is obtained by combining a novel
lifting approach with a recent result by Miller and Sheehy (2010).Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures. A preliminary version appeared in SoCG 201
Let P ⊆ R d be a d-dimensional n-point set. A Tverberg partition of P is a partition of P into r sets P1, . . . , Pr such that the convex hulls conv(P1), . . . , conv(Pr) have non-empty intersection. A point in r i=1 conv(Pi) is called a Tverberg point of depth r for P . A classic result by Tverberg implies that there always exists a Tverberg partition of size n/(d + 1) , but it is not known how to find such a partition in polynomial time. Therefore, approximate solutions are of interest.We describe a deterministic algorithm that finds a Tverberg partition of size n/4(d + 1)This means that for every fixed dimension we can compute an approximate Tverberg point (and hence also an approximate centerpoint) in linear time. Our algorithm is obtained by combining a novel lifting approach with a recent result by Miller and Sheehy [10].
We study the parameterized complexity of the following fundamental geometric problems with respect to the dimension d:i) Given n points in R d , compute their minimum enclosing cylinder.ii) Given two n-point sets in R d , decide whether they can be separated by two hyperplanes.iii) Given a system of n linear inequalities with d variables, find a maximum-size feasible subsystem.We show that (the decision versions of) all these problems are W[1]-hard when parameterized by the dimension d. Our reductions also give a n Ω(d) -time lower bound (under the Exponential Time Hypothesis).
For q ≥ 27 we determine the independence number α( ) of the Kneser graph on plane-solid flags in PG(6, q). More precisely we describe all maximal independent sets of size at least q 11 and show that every other maximal example has cardinality at most a constant times q 10 .
We study the following general stabbing problem from a parameterized
complexity point of view: Given a set $\mathcal S$ of $n$ translates of an
object in $\Rd$, find a set of $k$ lines with the property that every object in
$\mathcal S$ is ''stabbed'' (intersected) by at least one line.
We show that when $S$ consists of axis-parallel unit squares in $\Rtwo$ the
(decision) problem of stabbing $S$ with axis-parallel lines is W[1]-hard with
respect to $k$ (and thus, not fixed-parameter tractable unless FPT=W[1]) while
it becomes fixed-parameter tractable when the squares are disjoint. We also
show that the problem of stabbing a set of disjoint unit squares in $\Rtwo$
with lines of arbitrary directions is W[1]--hard with respect to $k$. Several
generalizations to other types of objects and lines with arbitrary directions
are also presented. Finally, we show that deciding whether a set of unit balls
in $\Rd$ can be stabbed by one line is W[1]--hard with respect to the dimension
$d$.Comment: Based on the MSc. Thesis of Daniel Werner, Free University Berlin,
Berlin, German
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.