Central limit theorem, High-frequency data, Microstructure noise, Semimartingale theory, Tests for jumps, Truncated power variation,

No abstract

We propose a new set of formal backtests for VaR-forecasts that significantly improve upon existing backtesting procedures. Our new test of unconditional coverage can be used for both directional and non-directional testing and is thus able to test separately whether a VaR-model is too conservative or underestimates the actual risk exposure. Second, we stress the importance of testing the property of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) VaRexceedances and propose a simple approach that explicitly tests for the presence of clusters in VaR-violation processes. Results from a simulation study indicate that our tests significantly outperform competing backtests in several distinct settings. In addition, the empirical analysis of a unique data set consisting of asset returns of an asset manager's portfolios underline the usefulness of our new backtests especially in times of market turmoil.Keywords: Value-at-Risk, backtesting, Monte Carlo simulation.JEL Classification: C52, C53, C58. * We thank Harald Rosenthal of RobinNova GmbH for providing the data set for our empirical application and helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Judith Lameyer and Janina Mühlnickel provided outstanding research assistance. A New Set of Improved Value-at-Risk Backtests ABSTRACTWe propose a new set of formal backtests for VaR-forecasts that significantly improve upon existing backtesting procedures. Our new test of unconditional coverage can be used for both directional and non-directional testing and is thus able to test separately whether a VaR-model is too conservative or underestimates the actual risk exposure.Second, we stress the importance of testing the property of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) VaRexceedances and propose a simple approach that explicitly tests for the presence of clusters in VaR-violation processes.Results from a simulation study indicate that our tests significantly outperform competing backtests in several distinct settings. In addition, the empirical analysis of a unique data set consisting of asset returns of an asset manager's portfolios underline the usefulness of our new backtests especially in times of market turmoil.

We propose a new set of formal backtests for VaR-forecasts that significantly improve upon existing backtesting procedures. Our new test of unconditional coverage can be used for both directional and non-directional testing and is thus able to test separately whether a VaR-model is too conservative or underestimates the actual risk exposure. Second, we stress the importance of testing the property of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) VaRexceedances and propose a simple approach that explicitly tests for the presence of clusters in VaR-violation processes. Results from a simulation study indicate that our tests significantly outperform competing backtests in several distinct settings. In addition, the empirical analysis of a unique data set consisting of asset returns of an asset manager's portfolios underline the usefulness of our new backtests especially in times of market turmoil.Keywords: Value-at-Risk, backtesting, Monte Carlo simulation.JEL Classification: C52, C53, C58. * We thank Harald Rosenthal of RobinNova GmbH for providing the data set for our empirical application and helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Judith Lameyer and Janina Mühlnickel provided outstanding research assistance. A New Set of Improved Value-at-Risk Backtests ABSTRACTWe propose a new set of formal backtests for VaR-forecasts that significantly improve upon existing backtesting procedures. Our new test of unconditional coverage can be used for both directional and non-directional testing and is thus able to test separately whether a VaR-model is too conservative or underestimates the actual risk exposure.Second, we stress the importance of testing the property of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) VaRexceedances and propose a simple approach that explicitly tests for the presence of clusters in VaR-violation processes.Results from a simulation study indicate that our tests significantly outperform competing backtests in several distinct settings. In addition, the empirical analysis of a unique data set consisting of asset returns of an asset manager's portfolios underline the usefulness of our new backtests especially in times of market turmoil.

No abstract