Hypopituitarism is defined as a complete or partial deficiency in one or more pituitary hormones. Anterior hypopituitarism includes secondary adrenal insufficiency, central hypothyroidism, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, growth hormone deficiency and prolactin deficiency. Patients with hypopituitarism suffer from an increased disability and sick days, resulting in lower health status, higher cost of care and an increased mortality. In particular during adulthood, isolated pituitary deficits are not an uncommon finding; their clinical picture is represented by vague symptoms and unclear signs, which can be difficult to properly diagnose. This often becomes a challenge for the physician. Aim of this narrative review is to analyse, for each anterior pituitary deficit, the main related etiologies, the characteristic signs and symptoms, how to properly diagnose them (suggesting an easy and reproducible step-based approach), and eventually the treatment. In adulthood, the vast majority of isolated pituitary deficits are due to pituitary tumours, head trauma, pituitary surgery and brain radiotherapy. Immune-related dysfunctions represent a growing cause of isolated pituitary deficiencies, above all secondary to use of oncological drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. The diagnosis of isolated pituitary deficiencies should be based on baseline hormonal assessments and/or dynamic tests. Establishing a proper diagnosis can be quite challenging: in fact, even if the diagnostic methods are becoming increasingly refined, a considerable proportion of isolated pituitary deficits still remains without a certain cause. While isolated ACTH and TSH deficiencies always require a prompt replacement treatment, gonadal replacement therapy requires a benefit-risk evaluation based on the presence of comorbidities, age and gender of the patient; finally, the need of growth hormone replacement therapies is still a matter of debate. On the other side, prolactin replacement therapy is still not available. In conclusion, our purpose is to offer a broad evaluation from causes to therapies of isolated anterior pituitary deficits in adulthood. This review will also include the evaluation of uncommon symptoms and main etiologies, the elements of suspicion of a genetic cause and protocols for diagnosis, follow-up and treatment.

Purpose Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) are the first-line medical treatment for acromegaly. Gallbladder alterations are one of most important SRL side effect, but according to some authors growth hormone hypersecretion itself is a risk factor for gallstones. This single center, longitudinal retrospective study evaluated the incidence and the predictors of biliary adverse events (BAE) in acromegaly during SRL therapy and their response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Methods 91 acromegaly patients with indication to SRL were enrolled. Evaluations of acromegaly activity (GH, IGF-I, IGF-I/ULN) and metabolic profile were collected before starting treatment, yearly during follow-up and at BAE onset. In patients developing BAE we searched for predictors of UDCA effectiveness. Results 61.5% of patients developed BAE (58.9% cholelithiasis; 41.1% only sludge). IGF-I and IGF-I/ULN proved to be positive predictor of BAE, which occur about 5 years after SRL starting. None of metabolic markers proved to be associated with BAE. Only five patients (5.5%) underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. 71% of patients started UDCA treatment, achieving regression of BAE in 60% of cases (88% in patients developing only sludge and 30% in patients affected by cholelithiasis, p < 0.001). BMI and obesity were negative predictors of UDCA efficacy. In 50% of the subjects BAE resolved after 36 months of therapy with a lower rate if cholelithiasis was present. Conclusion Biliary stone disease is a frequent SRL adverse event, although it is often symptomless. Ultrasound follow-up mainly in the first 5 years of therapy, early UDCA starting and proper lifestyle represent a valid strategy in their detection and management.

Background When evaluating a patient for central adrenal insufficiency (CAI), there is a wide range of morning cortisol values for which no definite conclusion on hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis function can be drawn; in these cases, a stimulation test is required. Aim of this study was to develop an integrated model for CAI prediction when morning cortisol is in the grey zone, here defined as 40.0–160.0 μg/L. Methods Overall, 119 patients with history of sellar tumour which underwent insulin tolerance test (ITT) for the evaluation of HPA axis were enrolled. Supervised regression techniques were used for model development. Results An integrated predictive model was developed and internally validated, and showed a significantly better diagnostic performance than morning cortisol alone (AUC 0.811 vs 0.699, p = 0.003). A novel predictive score (CAI-score) was retrieved, on a 5.5-point scale, by considering morning cortisol (0 points if 130.1–160.0 μg/L, 1 point if 100.1–130.0 μg/L, 1.5 points if 70.1–100.0 μg/L, 2.5 points if 40.0–70.0 μg/L), other pituitary deficits (2 points if ≥ 3 deficits), and sex (1 point if male). A diagnostic algorithm integrating CAI-score and ITT was finally proposed, with an overall accuracy of 99%, and the possibility to avoid the execution of stimulation tests in 25% of patients. Conclusions This was the first study that proposed an integrated score for the prediction of CAI when morning cortisol is in the grey zone. This score might be helpful to reduce the number of patients who need a stimulation test for the assessment of HPA axis function.

Objective The glucagon stimulation test involves the peptide intramuscular or subcutaneous administration for the diagnosis of hypopituitarism. To date no data are available regarding its intranasal formulation. Our study intended to investigate the role of intranasal glucagon as a potential stimulus test for the evaluation of the corticotropic, somatotropic and antidiuretic axes. Design Non-randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study including 10 healthy subjects (50% women). Methods All participants underwent to 2 days of testing and intranasal glucagon or placebo were administered. At baseline, every 15' up to +90', and then every 30' up to +180' a blood sample was taken for ACTH, cortisol, GH, copeptin, glucose, insulin, sodium, potassium, plasma osmolarity. At baseline and at the end of the test urinary osmolarity was evaluated as well. Results After administration of both glucagon and placebo ACTH and cortisol values decreased progressively (p&lt;0.001), but in the drug group the reduction in cortisol was less accentuated up to +90' (p&lt;0.05). GH values decreased after placebo administration (p&lt;0.001); on the other hand, after glucagon an increasing, yet non-significant trend was observed (p=0.096) with the difference between the two groups evident starting from +120' onwards (p&lt;0.005). The placebo administration led to a reduction of copeptin while its stability was observed after glucagon administration. Six subjects developed hypokalemia (i.e. potassium &lt;3.5 mmol/L) post-glucagon, with the nadir at 45’ (3.6 [3.2-3.8] mmol/L) significantly correlated with the immediate post-glycemic rise insulin peak (Spearman's rho -0.719; p=0.019). No significant differences were observed compared to the other analytes tested. Conclusions Intranasal glucagon administration is not an effective stimulus for hypophyseal secretion. Hypokalemia secondary to hyperinsulinemic rebound appears to be a frequent complication of its acute administration.