Introduction: To report a case of unilateral corneal perforation due to isolated ocular lichen planus. Methods: Interventional case report. Informed consent by the patient was obtained to publish clinical images. A 64-year-old male presented with severe vision loss and a 2-week history of corneal perforation treated with penetrating keratoplasty in the left eye. He had a longstanding diagnosis of severe chronic dry eye disease. On the initial assessment a visual acuity of 20/50 in the RE and HM perception in the left eye were documented. Biomicroscopy revealed subepithelial fibrosis on the tarsal conjunctiva and clinical signs of severe dry eye disease in both eyes. A clear corneal button and a white cataract were observed in the left eye. No other skin or mucosal lesions were observed. Results: An excisional biopsy of the bulbar conjunctiva was performed under topical anesthesia. Direct immunofluorescence analysis revealed a linear deposit of fibrinogen in the basement membrane consistent with ocular lichen planus. Clinical improvement was achieved using aggressive topical lubrication, corneal epithelial regenerators, topical tacrolimus, and immunosuppressive therapy with systemic corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Conclusion: Isolated ocular lichen planus is an extremely infrequent presentation of lichen planus often indistinguishable from other cicatricial conjunctivitis. Corneal perforation is a severe complication associated with severe dry eye, not previously reported with ocular lichen planus. An adequate clinical assessment and histopathologic diagnosis are crucial to lead prompt treatment and prevent sight-threatening complications.

No abstract

Background: The role of scleral contact lenses (SCLs) has increasingly expanded since the first lens was fitted more than a century ago. While it was initially prescribed for the management of severely compromised corneas, the indications for modern SCL use have expanded to include less severe diseases. In this review, we aimed to provide an up-to-date overview of the current indications, complications, and outcomes for the various types of SCLs. Methods: In this narrative review, we thoroughly searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for literature published from January 1980 to November 2021. Only relevant up-to-date English references were included. Furthermore, the figures in this manuscript were derived from our unit’s patient documentation. Results: Currently, SCLs can successfully be used to manage ocular surface diseases, visually rehabilitate irregular corneas, and correct irregular refractive errors. Although newer materials have yielded the same visual outcomes with fewer complications, these consequences still occur in approximately one-third of contact lens wearers, including difficulties in insertion and/or removal, discomfort or pain, and developing either halos, blurriness, or haze. Even though most of these complications are minor and can be easily treated, a good practice is essential to avoid sight-threatening complications such as microbial keratitis. Conclusions: SCLs are indispensable in ophthalmic clinics. The development of better-quality SCLs has increased the number of indications and improved the achievable visual rehabilitation. The future of developing improvements in SCL design, materials, and fit, and the expansion of their indication range is promising.

The harvesting of corneal endothelial cells (CEC) has received special attention due to its potential as a therapy for corneal blindness. The main challenges are related to the culture media formulation, cellular density at the primary isolation, and the number of passages in which CEC can retain their functional characteristics. To alternate different media formulations to harvest CEC has an impact on the cellular yield and morphology. Therefore, we analyzed four different sequences of growth factor-supplemented Stimulatory (S) and non-supplemented Quiescent (Q) media, upon passages to find the optimal S-Q culture sequence. We assessed cell yield, morphology, procollagen I production, Na + /K + -ATPase function, and the expression of ZO-1 and Na + /K + -ATPase. Our results show SQSQ and SQQQ sequences with a balance between an improved cell yield and hexagonal morphology rate. CEC cultured in the SQQQ sequence produced procollagen I, showed Na + /K + -ATPase function, and expression of ZO-1 and Na + /K + -ATPase. Our study sets a culture approach to guarantee CEC expansion, as well as functionality for their potential use in tissue engineering and in vivo analyses. Thus, the alternation of S and Q media improves CEC culture. SQQQ sequence demonstrated CEC proliferation and lower the cost implied in SQSQ sequences. We discarded the use of pituitary extract and ROCK inhibitors as essential for CEC proliferation.