Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

The aim of this work was to demonstrate the advantages of using telemedicine (TM) in the management of the outpatients with maxillofacial surgical pathologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted at the MaxilloFacial Surgery Unit of “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, on two different groups of patients: a group of follow-up patients (A1: patients in oncological follow-up after surgical treatment performed before the COVID-19 pandemic; A2: suffering from chronic lesions such as precancerous lesions), and a group B of patients with first urgent visits (B1: patients with suspected oncological pathology; B2: patients with suspected urgent disease such as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), odontogenic abscesses, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dislocation, etc.). Participation in the study required possession of a smartphone with Internet access, e-mail and the use of a messaging service (WhatsApp or Telegram) to send photos and messages; completion by the patient of a COVID-19 screening questionnaire; submission of a satisfaction questionnaire by the doctors and patients. A total of 90 patients were included in this study. A high percentage of satisfaction emerged from the analysis of the satisfaction questionnaires of both patients and doctors.TM thus represents an excellent opportunity to improve accessibility to oncological and non-management activities, reducing the risk of Covid-19 dissemination and should be promoted and implemented in the post-pandemic era.

they probably indicate patterns in utilization. Race and socioeconomic status are separate entities, but unfortunately they are all too often interrelated. These statistics could highlight disparities in access, as the cost of inflatable waterslides begins at $900 and can be in excess of $8,000. 9 Other reasons for different utilization could be attributed to cultural practices or preferences.Our study reviewed the largest sample of head and neck water slide injuries in the literature, and our findings largely validate the experiences of prior anecdotal series. Craniomaxillofacial fractures from waterslides are rare, as the forces from most injuries do not appear to be high impact. Of the 46 injuries identified by Paulozzi et al, 20 (43.5%) were in the head and neck. 3 Half of these resulted in lacerations, and all but one of the remaining injuries let to a concussion. Malpass et al found a similar predominance of lacerations (53%) and paucity of fractures (7%). 2 In general, fatalities were rare with only one documented case among published studies. 2 When comparing public and private waterslides, it is important to consider differences in how the slides are operated and used. Unnecessarily risky riding behavior and misuse may in part account for the different patterns of injury observed between waterslide types. Backyard slides are largely without independent supervision by an attendant. Private slides rely only on adult volunteers and a set of unstandardized rules. One prior author assessed the adequacy of uniform control systems (ie, traffic light system, closed circuit television, warning notices, part-time supervision, and rider behavior regulation) in waterslides. Their investigation determined that, despite strict implementation, a small but significant percentage of consecutive riders were still predisposed to interpersonal collision. Despite best efforts waterslides carry an inherent risk of unavoidable injury. Presumably, the probability of avoidable injury with backyard slides would be even greater. Interestingly, we found that the share of cranial injuries was greater with backyard slides. This aligns with our hypothesis that the unsafe practice of headfirst riding may be more prevalent in this group.Waterslides inherently carry injury risk by virtue of their mechanism of action. However, there are certain safe riding habits that can be implemented to reduce the likelihood of head, neck, and body trauma. Sliding feet first in a supine or seated position eliminates the cranium as the first point of contact. Riding on the stomach should always be avoided, and all body parts should remain within the confines of the slide. Riders should not attempt to achieve unsafe traveling velocities by taking running starts. Likewise, mats or other accessories should not be permitted on slides as they may further decrease friction and reduce control. The end of the slide should always remain unobstructed. For public slides, riders should exit plunge pools as soon as possible to avoid blindside collisions. For b...

No abstract