No abstract

Introduction: The study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of adalimumab as well as investigate the persistence of treatment and identify factors, which may affect it. Methods: More than 1150 patients (4363.1 patient-years) with psoriasis who had been treated with adalimumab since the start of the BIOREP registry in the Czech Republic were included in this analysis. Treatment effectiveness was defined as improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The analysis was performed during the years 2005 and 2018. Patients were on on-label dose. Results: After 12 and 96 months of therapy, 84% and 88% of patients had a 75% reduction in PASI score from baseline, respectively. Drug survival was analyzed according to the number of previous biological therapies, and results showed 75% and 58.1% survival rate for biologically naïve patients in the 20th and 80th month of treatment, respectively. The negative predictors of adalimumab survival were the female gender, obesity, baseline PASI score and the number of previous biological therapies. Conclusions: Baseline factors including PASI, number of previous biological therapies, and sex were associated with shorter adalimumab survival. This long-term study shows that adalimumab is effective and has high treatment persistence.

Background: A poor patient adherence often limits the real-world effectiveness of an oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). In the present study, we aimed to map patient preferences, attitudes toward treatment, and quality of life to identify the predictors of non-adherence to teriflunomide. Methods: This was a single-arm, non-interventional, multicenter study (Czech Act 378/2007 Coll.) consisting of three visits: the first at treatment initiation (teriflunomide 14 mg), and then after 3 and 9 months of therapy. We enrolled both DMT-naïve and patients who had undergone a DMT diagnosed with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The functional status and MS activity were estimated using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate (ARR); the quality of life via the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29); the medication adherence with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8); the confidence in the ability to take medications by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Score (SEAMS); and the attitude to the therapy via the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). After nine months of therapy, we predicted the adherence to teriflunomide (MMAS-8) by fitting a multivariate ordinal logistic model with EDSS changes, gender, previous DMT, MSIS-29, BMQ, and SEAMS as the explanatory variables. Results: Between 2018 and 2019, 114 patients were enrolled at 10 sites in the Czech Republic. The mean age was 41.2 years, 64.8% were diagnosed with a CIS, 52.4% were DMT-naïve, and 98.1% of patients preferred an oral administration at the baseline. The mean EDSS baseline was 1.97 and remained constant during the 9 months of therapy. The ARR baseline was 0.72 and dropped to 0.19 and 0.15 after 3 and 9 months, respectively. Despite a more than 4-fold higher ARR baseline, the treatment-naïve patients achieved an ARR at 9 months comparable with those previously treated. There were ten non-serious adverse reactions. After nine months of teriflunomide therapy, 63.3%, 21.2%, and 15.4% of patients had a high, medium, and low adherence, respectively, as per the MMAS-8; 100% of patients preferred an oral administration. The SEAMS score (odds ratio (OR) = 0.91; p = 0.013) and previous DMT (OR = 4.28; p = 0.005) were the only significant predictors of non-adherence. The disability, the quality of life, and beliefs about medicines had no measurable effect on adherence. Conclusion: After nine months of teriflunomide therapy, both the disability and quality of life remained stable; the relapse rate significantly decreased, 63.3% of patients had a high adherence, and 100% of patients preferred an oral administration. A low adherence was associated with previous DMT experiences and a low self-efficacy for the appropriate medication (i.e., the confidence in one’s ability to take medication correctly).

Objectives:The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in a real-life Czech bicentric cohort.Methods: We retrospectively analysed 50 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab in two centres in the Czech Republic. Baseline characteristics, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were collected at baseline and each 3 following months. The proportion of patients achieving EASI50, EASI75, EASI90 and EASI100 were analysed. Levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) were collected before and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Adverse events were recorded as well.Results: Thirty-two men and 18 women with mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.7 were enrolled in our analysis. The mean age of the patients was 37.6 years and the mean time from diagnosis until the initiation of dupilumab therapy was 35.0 years. After 4 months, EASI75 was achieved by 75.7%, out of which 40.5% achieved EASI90 and 10.8% achieved complete clearance. Improvement continued with time, and the proportion of patients with EASI90 increased to 71.4% at the 6th month and at the 12th month of therapy the EASI90 was 65.2%. EASI100 was achieved by 14.3% and 13.0% at the 6th and 12th month, respectively. A marked reduction was observed in the DLQI and also in IgE levels. EASI responses were independent of BMI. No new safety issues were identified. Adverse events were experienced by 44% (22/50) of the patients and they were all mild in intensity. Conjunctivitis and herpes simplex virus infection were the most common adverse events.Conclusion: Our results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a real-life setting in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD in the Czech Republic. Dupilumab was well-tolerated and resulted in a significant clinical improvement in combination with improvement of quality of life.

Východiska: Fibrilace síní (FiS) postihuje až 46,3 milionu osob, její prevalence se za posledních 50 let ztrojnásobila. FiS vede ke vzniku krevních sraženin a zvyšuje čtyřnásobně riziko cévní mozkové příhody. Preventivní antikoagulační léčba warfarinem je dobře zavedena po více než 50 let, má však účinnostní a bezpečnostní nedostatky. Nová antikoagulancia nevyžadují laboratorní monitoraci protrombinového času (INR), mají nízké riziko nežádoucích příhod, jsou však nákladnější. Metody: Tato neintervenční (Zákon č. 378/2007 Sb.) retrospektivně prospektivní jednoramenná kohortová studie sestávala ze tří návštěv. Primárním cílem bylo srovnání celkových přímých nákladů na léčbu warfarinem a apixabanem. Pacienti s nevalvulární FiS byli zařazeni v době ukončení léčby warfarinem a přechodu na apixaban. Náklady byly odvozeny od poskytnuté péče na základě seznamu zdravotních výkonů a dle vyhlášky 268 z roku 2019. Spokojenost byla stanovena pomocí dotazníku SAFUCA®.