No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted evaluate the influence of reconstruction parameters of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images on bone mineral density (BMD) analyses. Materials and Methods:The sample consisted of micro-CT images of the maxillae of 5 Wistar rats, acquired using a SkyScan 1174 unit (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). Each acquisition was reconstructed following the manufacturer's recommendations (standard protocol; SP) for the application of artifact correction tools (beam hardening correction [BHC], 45%; smoothing filter, degree 2; and ring artifact correction [RAC], level 5). Additionally, images were reconstructed with 36 protocols combining different settings of artifact correction tools (P0 to P35). BMD analysis was performed for each reconstructed image. The BMD values obtained for each protocol were compared to those obtained using the SP through repeated-measures analysis of variance with the Dunnett post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results:The BMD values obtained from all protocols that used a BHC of 45% did not significantly differ from those obtained using the SP (P>0.05). The other protocols all yielded significantly different BMD values from the SP (P<0.05). The smoothing and RAC tools did not affect BMD values. Conclusion: BMD values measured on micro-CT images were influenced by the BHC level. Higher levels of BHC induced higher values of BMD.

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the level of three micro-CT reconstruction tools: beam-hardening correction (BHC), smoothing filter (SF), and ring artefact correction (RAC) on the fractal dimension (FD) analysis of trabecular bone. Methods: Five Wistar rats’ maxillae were individually scanned in a SkyScan 1174 micro-CT device, under the following settings: 50 kV, 800 µA, 10.2 µm voxel size, 0.5 mm Al filter, rotation step 0.5°, two frames average, 180° rotation and scan time of 35 min. The raw images were reconstructed under the standard protocol (SP) recommended by the manufacturer, a protocol without any artefact correction tools (P0) and 35 additional protocols with different combinations of SF, RAC and BHC levels. The same volume of interest was established in all reconstructions for each maxilla and the FD was calculated using the Kolmogorov (box counting) method. One-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test was used to compare the FD of each reconstruction protocol (P0–P35) with the SP (α = 5%). Multiple linear regression verified the dependency of reconstruction tools in FD. Results: Overall, FD values are not dependent on RAC (p = 0.965), but increased significantly when the level of BHC and SF increased (p < 0.001). FD values from protocols with BHC at 45% combined with SF of 2, and BHC at 30% combined with SF of 4 or 6 had no statistical difference compared to SP. Conclusions: BHC and SF tools affect the FD values of micro-CT images of the trabecular bone. Therefore, these reconstruction parameters should be standardized when the FD is analyzed.

No abstract