Objective
To compare the effects of tumor volume (TV), tumor percentage involvement (TPI) and prostate volume (PV) on PSA recurrence (PSAR) following radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
A cohort of 3528 patients receiving RP between 1988 and 2008 was retrieved from the Duke Prostate Center. Patients were stratified by TV (<3cc, 3-6cc, >6cc), TPI (<10%, 10-20%, >20%) and PV (<35cc, 35-45cc, >45cc) and their effects on PSAR evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Clinico-pathological variables included in univariate analysis were age at surgery, race, year of surgery, PSA, pathological Gleason score, pathological tumor stage, margin status, extra capsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). The effects of TV, TPI and PV (as continuous and categorical variables) on PSAR were compared using Cox analysis.
Results
TPI, TV and PV were predictive of PSAR (p <0.05) in KM. In multivariate analysis as continuous variables, TPI and PV were predictive of PSAR (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.16 and OR = 0.65, p <0.05). As categorical variables, TPI > 20% and PV 10-35cc were predictive of PSAR (OR = 1.45 and OR = 1.25, p <0.05). TV was not predictive of PSAR in either analysis. Pathological Gleason score ≥ 7, PSA, positive margins, SVI and tumor stage T3/4 were found to be predictors of PSAR (p <0.05).
Conclusions
TV, TPI and PV were predictive of PSAR in univariate analysis, but only TPI and PV were predictive in multivariate analysis. TPI and PV should be considered when evaluating, assessing and counseling patients about PSAR risk.