Objective: For a variety of reasons, many emergency department (ED) visits are classified as less-or nonurgent (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale [CTAS] level IV and V). A recent survey in a tertiary care ED identified some of these reasons. The purpose of our study was to determine if these same reasons applied to patients presenting with problems triaged at a similar level at a lowvolume rural ED. Methods: A 9-question survey tool was administered to 141 CTAS level IV and V patients who attended the South Huron Hospital ED, in Exeter, Ontario, over a 2-week period in December 2006. Results: Of the 141 eligible patients, 137 (97.2%) completed the study. One hundred and twentytwo patients (89.1%) reported having a family physician (FP) and 53 (38.7%) had already seen an FP before presenting to the ED. Just over one-half of all patients (51.1%) had their problem for more than 48 hours, and 42 (30.7%) stated that they were referred to the ED for care. Fifty-three (38.7%) of the respondents felt they needed treatment as soon as possible. Many patients reported coming to the ED because: 1) their FP office was closed (21.9%); 2) they could not get a timely appointment (16.8%); or 3) the walk-in clinic was closed (24.8%). Only 6 patients (4.4%) specifically stated that they came to the ED because they had no FP. One-third of patients attended the ED because they believed it offered specialized services. Conclusion: In this rural setting, most less-or nonurgent ED patients had an FP yet they went to the ED because they did not have access to primary care, because they perceived their problem to be urgent or because they were referred for or sought specific services. RÉSUMÉ Objectif : Pour de nombreuses raisons, bon nombre des patients se présentant à l'urgence sont classés dans les catégories « moins urgent » ou « non urgent » correspondant respectivement aux niveaux IV et V de l'Échelle canadienne de triage et de gravité (ÉTG). Un récent sondage réalisé à l'urgence d'un centre hospitalier de soins de troisième ligne a mis en lumière certaines raisons. L'objectif de notre étude était de déterminer si les mêmes raisons s'appliqueraient au triage à un niveau semblable chez les patients se présentant à l'urgence dans un centre hospitalier à faible achalandage en milieu rural.

Ketamine is an effective agent in facilitating intubation in a HEMS environment. Complications are similar to use in the controlled Emergency Department setting.

No abstract

Objective:The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations recommends that patients admitted to hospital with pneumonia receive their first dose of antibiotics within 6 hours of presenting to the emergency department (ED). Previous research in the United States indicates that rural hospitals may be better at achieving this benchmark than urban centres. This particular quality indicator has not yet been evaluated in Canada. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the target door-to-antibiotic (DTA) time of 6 hours or less could be met in a rural ED.Methods:We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of pneumonia. Descriptive data for each case was collected, including demographic and timeline information. We analyzed DTA time, antibiotic type, route of administration, hospital length of stay and disposition at discharge.Results:We reviewed a total of 320 charts from Apr. 1, 2003, to Mar. 31, 2008. The final sample consisted of 143 patients (50.3% women) whose median age was 79 years. The median DTA time was 151 minutes and 81.8% of patients received their first dose of antibiotics within 6 hours. Patients received antibiotics either orally (47.6%), intravenously (47.6%) or both (4.8%). Single-agent respiratory fluoroquinolones were used 71.4% of the time. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days; most patients were discharged home (79.7%), 11 died, 11 were transferred and 7 were discharged to a nursing home.Conclusion:A DTA time of 6 hours or less is achievable in a rural ED.

No abstract