Objective The aim of the study was to elucidate the risk factors underlying abnormal cytology-based cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) in justice-involved women (JIW) compared with non-JIW in an urban safety net hospital. Methods Retrospective chart review of women with a history of correctional involvement who received care at Grady Health System between 2010 and 2018 and had a Pap test was performed (n = 191). An age-matched cohort of women with no correctional involvement and had a Pap test at Grady served as the control (n = 394). Variables of interest were age, HIV, smoking, race, mental health history, and history of incarceration. Outcomes of interests were rate of abnormal Pap tests and follow-up. χ2 and logistic regression models evaluated associations between the variables of interest and outcomes. Results Rates of abnormal Pap tests were significantly higher in JIW (35.6%) than controls (18.5%, p < .0001). Compared with controls, JIW were significantly more likely to have high-grade cervical cytology (odds ratio [OR] = 3.89, p < .0005) and be lost to gynecologic follow-up (OR = 8.75, p < .0001) and a history of severe mental illness (29.5% vs 4.3%, p < .0001). Those with abnormal Pap tests were likely to be HIV-positive (OR = 20.7, p < .001) and have a history of incarceration (OR = 2.33, p < .001). Predictors of high-grade Pap test were smoking history (OR = 0.16, p = .014), HIV-positive (OR = 3.66, p = .025), and history of incarceration (OR = 3.96, p < .0005). Conclusions Justice-involved women represent a high-risk subpopulation with significantly increased rates of high-grade cytology and lost to follow-up. This underscores the need for attention to screening programs and follow-up interventions for JIW.

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) experience disproportionately high burdens of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated anal cancers. Recent focus has shifted to anorectal cancer prevention through high-resolution anoscopy (HRA); however, little is known about sexual minority men’s perceptions, attitudes, or beliefs regarding HRA. We conducted 4 qualitative Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) (n = 15) with sexual minority men, focusing on their beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of undergoing HRA. Participants discussed their experiences of HPV/HRA as influenced by both their gender and sexuality, including unawareness of HPV disease as a male health issue, challenges relating to female-oriented HPV/HRA language, conception of HPV/HRA as related to prostate health, and connecting their sexual behavior identification as “bottoms” to their need for HRA. As efforts to improve HRA knowledge, access, and uptake among sexual and gender minority communities increase, special attention should be paid to language and messaging choices around HRA.

No abstract