No abstract

Cocos nucifera (L.) (Arecaceae) is commonly called the “coconut tree” and is the most naturally widespread fruit plant on Earth. Throughout history, humans have used medicinal plants therapeutically, and minerals, plants, and animals have traditionally been the main sources of drugs. The constituents of C. nucifera have some biological effects, such as antihelminthic, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antioxidant, antifungal, antimicrobial, and antitumor activities. Our objective in the present study was to review the phytochemical profile, pharmacological activities, and toxicology of C. nucifera to guide future preclinical and clinical studies using this plant. This systematic review consisted of searches performed using scientific databases such as Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, SciVerse, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. Some uses of the plant were partially confirmed by previous studies demonstrating analgesic, antiarthritic, antibacterial, antipyretic, antihelminthic, antidiarrheal, and hypoglycemic activities. In addition, other properties such as antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, cardioprotective, antiseizure, cytotoxicity, hepatoprotective, vasodilation, nephroprotective, and anti-osteoporosis effects were also reported. Because each part of C. nucifera has different constituents, the pharmacological effects of the plant vary according to the part of the plant evaluated.

Resumo Contexto: Há escassez de instrumentos validados para o estudo da religiosidade em amostras brasileiras. Um recente estudo realizado em uma amostra comunitária sugeriu adequada validade para a versão em português brasileiro do índice de Religiosidade de Duke (P-DUREL). Entretanto, as propriedades psicométricas do P-DUREL não foram estudadas em amostras psiquiátricas e/ou de estudantes universitários. Objetivo: Determinar a consistência interna, a confiabilidade teste-reteste e a validade convergente-discriminante do P-DUREL em duas amostras distintas. Métodos: Amostra 1: estudantes universitários (n = 323). Amostra 2: pacientes psiquiátricos (n = 102). Foram aplicados o P-DUREL e o Instrumento de Qualidade de Vida da Organização Mundial da Saú-de -Módulo Espiritualidade, Religiosidade e Crenças Pessoais (WHOQOL-SRPB) em ambas as amostras; os sintomas psicológicos foram medidos por meio do Inventário Beck de Depressão (IDB) e do Inventário Beck de Ansiedade (IAB) na amostra 1 e da Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressão (HADS) na amostra 2. Resultados: O P-DUREL teve adequada consistência interna (α de Cronbach > 0,80) e confiabilidade teste-reteste (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse > 0,90) em ambas as amostras. Correlações moderadas entre as subescalas da P-DUREL (0,58 < r < 0,71) foram observadas. Além disso, correlações significantes entre os escores do P-DUREL com o escore geral do WHOQOL-SRPB, bem como com medidas de sintomas psicológicos, foram observadas em ambas as amostras. Conclusão: O presente estudo abre perspectivas para o uso do P-DUREL para a investigação das dimensões da religiosidade em amostras brasileiras com características sociodemográficas diversas. Taunay TCD, et al. / Rev Psiq Clín. 2012;39(4):130-5Palavras-chave: Religiosidade, estudo de validação, Índice de Religiosidade de Duke, saúde mental, sintomas depressivos. AbstractBackground: There is a shortage of validated instruments for the study of religiousness in Brazilian samples. A recent study in a community sample pointed to an adequate validity for the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Duke Religiosity Index (P-DUREL). Nevertheless, no study to date has investigated the psychometric properties of the P-DUREL in psychiatric and/or university student samples. Objective: To determine the internal consistency, the test-retest reliability and the convergent-discriminant validity of the P-DUREL in two distinct samples. Methods: Sample 1: university students (n = 323). Sample 2: psychiatric patients (n = 102). The P-DUREL and the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument--Spirituality, Religion and Personal Beliefs module (WHOQOL-SRPB); psychological distress symptoms were measured by means the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in sample 1, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in sample 2. Results: The P-DUREL had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.80) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.90) in both samples. Moderate ...

The microbiota-gut-brain axis is a bidirectional signaling mechanism between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. The complexity of the intestinal ecosystem is extraordinary; it comprises more than 100 trillion microbial cells that inhabit the small and large intestine, and this interaction between microbiota and intestinal epithelium can cause physiological changes in the brain and influence mood and behavior. Currently, there has been an emphasis on how such interactions affect mental health. Evidence indicates that intestinal microbiota are involved in neurological and psychiatric disorders. This review covers evidence for the influence of gut microbiota on the brain and behavior in Alzheimer disease, dementia, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia. The primary focus is on the pathways involved in intestinal metabolites of microbial origin, including short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan metabolites, and bacterial components that can activate the host’s immune system. We also list clinical evidence regarding prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation as adjuvant therapies for neuropsychiatric disorders.