No abstract

OBJECTIVE:The aim of the present study was to assess nasal mucociliary clearance, mucus properties and inflammation in smokers and subjects enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Program (referred to as quitters).METHOD:A total of 33 subjects with a median (IQR) smoking history of 34 (20-58) pack years were examined for nasal mucociliary clearance using a saccharine transit test, mucus properties using contact angle and sneeze clearability tests, and quantification of inflammatory and epithelial cells, IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations in nasal lavage fluid. Twenty quitters (mean age: 51 years, 9 male) were assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and 12 months after smoking cessation, and 13 smokers (mean age: 52 years, 6 male) were assessed at baseline and after 12 months. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02136550.RESULTS:Smokers and quitters showed similar demographic characteristics and morbidities. At baseline, all subjects showed impaired nasal mucociliary clearance (mean 17.6 min), although 63% and 85% of the quitters demonstrated significant nasal mucociliary clearance improvement at 1 month and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, quitters also showed mucus sneeze clearability improvement (∼26%), an increased number of macrophages (2-fold) and no changes in mucus contact angle or cytokine concentrations.CONCLUSION:This study showed that smoking cessation induced early improvements in nasal mucociliary clearance independent of mucus properties and inflammation. Changes in mucus properties were observed after only 12 months of smoking cessation.

No abstract

Furosemide, a potent diuretic, affects ion and water movement across the respiratory epithelium. However, the effects of furosemide, as clinically used, on mucociliary clearance, a critical respiratory defense mechanism, are still lacking in humans. Fourteen young healthy subjects were assigned to three random interventions, spaced one-week apart: no intervention (control), oral furosemide (40mg), and furosemide+oral volume replacement (F+R). Nasal mucociliary clearance was assessed by saccharine test (STT), and mucus properties were in vitro evaluated by means of contact angle and transportability by sneeze. Urine output and osmolality were also evaluated. Urine output increased and reduced urine osmolality in furosemide and F+R compared to the control condition. STT remained stable in the control group. In contrast, STT increased significantly (40%) after furosemide and F+R. There were no changes in vitro mucus properties in all groups. In conclusion, furosemide prolongs STT in healthy young subjects. This effect is not prevented by fluid replacement, suggesting a direct effect of furosemide on the respiratory epithelium.

CPAP alone had no effect on mucus clearance, sputum properties, or expectorated volume, and did not potentiate the effect of HTS alone in CF subjects.