Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a popular second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several studies have reported on the association between DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with conflicting results. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the risk for IBD with DPP-4 inhibitor therapy. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European Clinical Trials Database was performed (December 2018). All controlled clinical trials and observational studies of DPP-4 inhibitors that reported events of IBD, Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) or colitis and had a duration ≥52 weeks were included. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was utilized to assess the relative risk (RR) for IBD post DPP-4 inhibitor exposure. Results: A total of 16 individual studies evaluating a total of 198 404 patients were included for analysis. Studies ranged from 52 weeks through 5 years. In the primary random-effects analysis, DPP-4 inhibitor exposure resulted in a nonsignificant increase in the risk of IBD (RR = 1.52; 95% CI = 0.72 to 3.24; I2 = 54.2%). Sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effects model demonstrated significantly increased risk (RR = 3.01; 95% CI = 2.30-3.93). DPP-4 inhibitor use significantly increased the risk of CD (RR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.36 to 4.48). All findings were driven by the inclusion of 1 large study. Conclusion and Relevance: Based on a conservative random-effects analysis, DPP-4 inhibitors do not appear to increase the risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease. However, long-term postmarketing surveillance is warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.