Core Ideas Mixtures of legumes and grasses were dynamic in composition over time. Forage mixtures with more legume had less biomass but had stable protein yield. Alfalfa persisted better than clover, and was favored when grown with bunchgrasses. When grown with meadow brome, alfalfa biomass in mixtures was 18 to 42% after 5 yr. Species identity regulated forage productivity more than the proportion legume seeded. To evaluate the comparative role of different legume–grass mixtures on long‐term forage yield, alfalfa (AL) (Medicago sativa L.) or clover (CL) (Trifolium sp.) were seeded at two sites in various combinations (0, 11, 22, 33, 67, or 100 kg 100 kg−1 of mix) with either rhizomatous grasses (smooth brome [Bromus inermis Leyss.] and Kentucky bluegrass [Poa pratensis L.]) or the bunchgrass meadow brome [Bromus riparius Rehmann]) to determine forage yield, quality, and legume persistence over 5 yr. Peak herbage yields were similar among swards initially seeded with 11 to 33 kg 100 kg−1 legumes, and occurred during the first 3 yr. Pure legume swards were slow to reach maximum biomass and increased crude protein yield (CPY) throughout the study. Regardless of companion grass identity, alfalfa‐based swards had more biomass and CPY than those containing clover. The proportion of alfalfa in mixed swards stabilized after 4 to 5 yr, and both legumes had greater abundance when grown with the bunchgrass rather than rhizomatous grasses. Although alfalfa was suppressed by rhizomatous grasses, their combined biomass was greater than in alfalfa–bunchgrass mixes, leading to similar CPY. Clover did not persist beyond 3 yr. The primary benefit of legumes in mixtures was an improvement in forage quality (i.e., CPY) rather than biomass. When establishing forage, species identity was critical to short‐term forage maximization, as was the presence of both legumes and grasses. In contrast, the relative proportion of legumes and grass at seeding had less influence on long‐term forage availability.
Forage establishment on fallow fields may be reduced by re-colonization and associated competition from hard to control perennial weeds that reproduce from residual root fragments. We assessed the competitive relationships between regenerating Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense L.) (CT) root fragments and seedlings of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) (WC), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) (KBG). Two greenhouse trials were conducted, each comparing 10 combinations of all three species grown in monoculture, or together (1:1:1 ratio), or in 1:2 and 2:1 binary mixtures in all possible combinations. All treatments were additionally done at two planting densities. After establishment, plants were grown for 70 d and assessed for biomass of all three species, as well as thistle shoot densities. Results from the two trials were similar. Canada thistle consistently produced the greatest biomass, and was more susceptible to intraspecific competition than competition from adjacent forage plants. Seedlings of neighboring WC were more effective competitors than KBG in reducing final thistle biomass and shoot density. White clover was also more likely to maintain shoot and root biomass under increasing weed presence. These results highlight the importance of reducing CT populations before forage seeding, as well as incorporating species such as WC that may be more tolerant of competition from the weed during the initial establishment period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.