In neoplastic cells of EBV-positive lymphoid malignancies latent membrane protein (LMP1) is expressed. Because no adequate cellular immune response can be detected against LMP1, we investigated whether LMP1 had a direct effect on T lymphocyte activation. In this study we show that nanogram amounts of purified recombinant LMP1 (rLMP1) strongly suppresses activation of T cells. By sequence alignment two sequences (LALLFWL and LLLLAL) in the first transmembrane domain of LMP1 were identified showing strong homology to the immunosuppressive domain (LDLLFL) of the retrovirus-encoded transmembrane protein p15E. The effects of rLMP1 and LMP1-derived peptides were tested in T cell proliferation and NK cytotoxicity assays and an Ag-induced IFN-γ release enzyme-linked immunospot assay. LMP1 derived LALLFWL peptides showed strong inhibition of T cell proliferation and NK cytotoxicity, while acetylated LALLFWL peptides had an even stronger effect. In addition, Ag-specific IFN-γ release was severely inhibited. To exert immunosuppressive effects in vivo, LMP1 has to be excreted from the cells. Indeed, LMP1 was detected in supernatant of EBV-positive B cell lines (LCL), and differential centrifugation in combination with Western blot analysis of the pellets indicated that LMP1 is probably secreted by LCL in the form of exosomes. The amount of secreted LMP1 in B cell cultures is well below the immunosuppressive level observed with rLMP1. Our results demonstrate direct immunosuppressive properties of LMP1 (fragments) and suggest that EBV-positive tumor cells may actively secrete LMP1 and thus mediate immunosuppressive effects on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Moreover, we demonstrate, for the first time, that transmembrane protein-mediated immunosuppression is not solely restricted to RNA tumor viruses, but can also be found in DNA tumor viruses.
In vitro studies suggest that resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis might explain poor response to therapy in fatal cases. Actual execution of apoptosis depends on proper functioning of effector caspases, particularly caspase 3, and on the expression levels of apoptosisregulating proteins, including Bcl-2 and the recently identified granzyme Bspecific protease inhibitor 9 (PI9). Thus, high levels of caspase 3 activation should reflect proper functioning of the apoptosis pathways, resulting in chemotherapysensitive neoplastic cells and a favorable prognosis. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying numbers of tumor cells positive for active caspase 3, Bcl-2, and PI9, respectively, in pretreatment biopsies of systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) patients and by comparing these numbers with clinical outcome. Activation of caspase 3 in more than 5% of the tumor cells was strongly correlated with a highly favorable outcome. High numbers of Bcl-2-and PI9-positive tumor cells were found to predict unfavorable prognosis. This prognostic effect was strongly related to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status: ALK-positive ALCL had significantly higher levels of active caspase 3, while high expression of the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and PI9 was almost completely restricted to ALK-negative cases. In conclusion, high numbers of active caspase 3-positive tumor cells predict a highly favorable prognosis in systemic ALCL patients. Poor prognosis is strongly related to high numbers of Bcl-2-and PI9-positive neoplastic cells. These data support the notion that a favorable response to chemotherapy depends on an intact apoptosis cascade. Moreover, these data indicate that differences in prognosis between ALK-positive and ALKnegative ALCL might be explained by differences in expression of apoptosisinhibiting proteins. (Blood. 2002;99: 4540-4546)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.