How peroxisomes are formed in eukaryotic cells is unknown but important for insight into a variety of diseases. Both human and yeast cells lacking peroxisomes due to mutations in PEX3 or PEX19 genes regenerate the organelles upon reintroduction of the corresponding wild-type version. To evaluate how and from where new peroxisomes are formed, we followed the trafficking route of newly made YFP-tagged Pex3 and Pex19 proteins by real-time fluorescence microscopy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Remarkably, Pex3 (an integral membrane protein) could first be observed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it concentrates in foci that then bud off in a Pex19-dependent manner and mature into fully functional peroxisomes. Pex19 (a farnesylated, mostly cytosolic protein) enriches first at the Pex3 foci on the ER and then on the maturing peroxisomes. This trafficking route of Pex3-YFP is the same in wild-type cells. These results demonstrate that peroxisomes are generated from domains in the ER.

SummaryStimulation of thyrocytes with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) leads to a morphological change and a massive increase in thyroglobulin (Tg) production. Although Tg is a demanding client of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), its increase did not result in significant accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER. Instead, ER chaperones and folding enzymes reached maximum synthesis rates immediately after TSH stimulation, before significant upregulation of Tg synthesis. The resulting increase in folding capacity before client protein production prevented cellular unfolded-protein stress, confirmed by the silence of the most conserved branch of the unfolded protein response. Thyrocytes set an example of physiological adaptation of cells to a future potentially stress-causing situation, which suggests a general strategy for both non-secretory and specialized secretory cells.

The Canopy (CNPY) family consists of four members predicted to be soluble proteins localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). They are involved in a wide array of processes, including angiogenesis, cell adhesion, and host defense. CNPYs are thought to do so via regulation of secretory transport of a diverse group of proteins, such as immunoglobulin M, growth factor receptors, toll‐like receptors, and the low‐density lipoprotein receptor. Thus far, a comparative analysis of the mammalian CNPY family is missing. Bioinformatic analysis shows that mammalian CNPYs, except the CNPY1 homolog, have N‐terminal signal sequences and C‐terminal ER‐retention signals and that mammals have an additional member CNPY5, also known as plasma cell‐induced ER protein 1/marginal zone B cell‐specific protein 1. Canopy proteins are particularly homologous in four hydrophobic alpha‐helical regions and contain three conserved disulfide bonds. This sequence signature is characteristic for the saposin‐like superfamily and strongly argues that CNPYs share this common saposin fold. We showed that CNPY2, 3, 4, and 5 (termed CNPYs) localize to the ER. In radioactive pulse‐chase experiments, we found that CNPYs rapidly form disulfide bonds and fold within minutes into their native forms. Disulfide bonds in native CNPYs remain sensitive to low concentrations of dithiothreitol (DTT) suggesting that the cysteine residues forming them are relatively accessible to solutes. Possible roles of CNPYs in the folding of secretory proteins in the ER are discussed.