Rationale: Because of the lack of an antidote or effective treatment, patients with severe acute diquat and glyphosate poisoning always died within a few hours. Extracorporeal membrane pulmonary oxygenation (ECMO), as an artificial heart-lung supporting system, can be applied to support lung that is expected to recover from reversible pathological damage. However, to our knowledge, the application of ECMO for patients with diquat and glyphosate poisoning has not been reported. Patient concerns: A 40-year-old man ingested in 100 ml of diquat (20 g/100 ml) and 400 ml glyphosate (41 g/100 ml) was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), immediately complicated by the development of ventricular fibrillation, respiratory failure, renal failure, and multi-organ failure. Diagnosis: Diquat and glyphosate poisoning were diagnosed by stated ingestion history, and the diagnostic criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome were also met. Interventions: He was treated with veno-venous ECMO. Outcomes: He was successfully transferred out of the ICU on day 46 and discharged on day 67. The computed tomography scan showed no obvious pulmonary fibrosis 2 months after poisoning. Lessons: ECMO may be effective in the treatment of patients with severe ARDS caused by diquat and glyphosate poisoning when conventional management does not work.
Lung injury is one of the leading causes of death in sepsis. Abietic acid (AA) has demonstrated antiinflammatory and bacteriostatic properties. Herein, we established a mouse model of sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture, and intraperitoneally injected AA to treat. Lung injury was assessed by H&E staining and the inflammation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were assessed by counting the number of inflammatory cells and detecting the content of inflammatory factors. Meanwhile, we also designed to study the effect of AA on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response and macrophage marker gene expression in RAW264.7 cells in vitro. In this study, we found that AA inhibited LPS-induced secretion of inflammatory mediators (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and MIP-2), and decreased the expression of M1 macrophage e markers (CD16 and iNOS) and p-p65 protein, while increased the expression of M2 macrophage markers (CD206 and Arg-1) in RAW264.7 cells in vitro. In vivo, the therapy of AA not only rescued septic animals, but also attenuated lung injury in sepsis mice. Moreover, AA decreased the number of total cells, neutrophils and macrophages, the conceration of total protein, and the levels of inflammatory mediators in BALF of sepsis mice. Further, we found that AA inhibited M1 macrophage polarization and blocked NF-κB pathway in BALF of sepsis mice. In conclusion, Abietic acid attenuates sepsis-induced lung injury, and its mechanism may be related to reducing inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB signaling to inhibit M1 macrophage polarization.
IntroductionAcute kidney injury (AKI) has high morbidity and mortality in intensive care units, which can lead to chronic kidney disease, more costs and longer hospital stay. Early identification of AKI is crucial for clinical intervention. Although various risk prediction models have been developed to identify AKI, the overall predictive performance varies widely across studies. Owing to the different disease scenarios and the small number of externally validated cohorts in different prediction models, the stability and applicability of these models for AKI in critically ill patients are controversial. Moreover, there are no current risk-classification tools that are standardised for prediction of AKI in critically ill patients. The purpose of this systematic review is to map and assess prediction models for AKI in critically ill patients based on a comprehensive literature review.Methods and analysisA systematic review with meta-analysis is designed and will be conducted according to the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). Three databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from inception through October 2020 will be searched to identify all studies describing development and/or external validation of original multivariable models for predicting AKI in critically ill patients. Random-effects meta-analyses for external validation studies will be performed to estimate the performance of each model. The restricted maximum likelihood estimation and the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method under a random-effects model will be applied to estimate the summary C statistic and 95% CI. 95% prediction interval integrating the heterogeneity will also be calculated to pool C-statistics to predict a possible range of C-statistics of future validation studies. Two investigators will extract data independently using the CHARMS checklist. Study quality or risk of bias will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval and patient informed consent are not required because all information will be abstracted from published literatures. We plan to share our results with clinicians and publish them in a general or critical care medicine peer-reviewed journal. We also plan to present our results at critical care international conferences.OSF registration number10.17605/OSF.IO/X25AT.
Objective: Weaning failure is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of pendelluft during the spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) as a predictor of weaning outcome of patients with mechanical ventilation.Methods: An observational cohort study included 60 critically ill patients who were eligible for extubation. Pendelluft and electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) were monitored at baseline and every 10 minutes for the first 30 min of SBT denoted as T0, T1, T2, and T3. The pendelluft was measured using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and Edi parameters were collected by Edi catheter. Patients were followed up after extubation and were divided into success group and failure group. Pendelluft, Edi parameters, respiratory parameters, and clinical outcomes such as intensive care units (ICU) stay, mortality, and 28-day ventilator-free days were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of pendelluft to predict weaning outcome.Results: Fifty patients (50/60) were successfully weaned from the machine and 10 (10/60) failed, with weaning failure rate of 16.7%. Respiratory parameters such as rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), respiratory rate (RR) and Edi parameters such as maximum value of Edi (Edimax), Edi variation between a maximum and minimum(ΔEdi) in the failure group were higher than those in the success group. The ICU stay and the 28-day ventilator-free days in the failure group were significantly longer than those in the success group. The 28-day mortality rate was higher in the failure group. The pendelluft mainly occurred in the early stage of SBT. Ventral pendelluft and total pendelluft in the failure group were higher than those in the success group at T1. Edimax and ΔEdi were positively correlated with pendelluft. The area under ROC curve (AUC) showed moderate predictive ability for ventral pendelluft in predicting weaning failure at T1 (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.58–0.94, cut-off value > 3% global tidal variation).Conclusion: Pendelluft is one of the factors leading to weaning failure, which may be related to diaphragm function. Measuring pendelluft volume maybe helpful to predict weaning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.