Human rights are a natural right that a person is born with; they cannot be taken away and their existence cannot be denied; in addition, human rights serve as accolades. Human rights and the rule of law are inextricably linked, and the rule of law, of course, prioritizes and defends human rights. The function of the law itself is to safeguard humans while they pursue their varied interests, with the caveat that individuals must also consider the interests of others in their pursuit of their own interests. In addition to the protection provided by the law, we have the right to protection from the government. The existence of a state of law signifies that both the state and society acknowledge the importance of human rights protection and guaranteeing their fulfillment. It will be possible to impose the appropriate punishment if a breach of human rights occurs in this manner. It is necessary to understand the relationship between the state of law and human rights in order to prevent human rights breaches from occurring.

Social stratification is a system in the social order that divides individuals into social classes. Finally, the social class will differentiate both the level and the rights and obligations of each individual in the class. The basis and core of a social stratification system is that there is an imbalance in the acquisition of rights and obligations, as well as responsibilities, between each individual and group in a series of social systems. The purpose of this research is to examine how law is applied at every level of society in Indonesia. This article was written using a qualitative technique, and it is designed to provide theoretical and practical usefulness to the community. According to the discussion, a social stratification system is one in which there is a distinction between one class or groups in standardized classes. Furthermore, there is evidence that there is a disparity between class stratification and law enforcement in Indonesia. As a result, law enforcement should be carried out in line with the applicable laws that have been jointly agreed upon in order to avoid creating a new long-term problems.

Corruption is a product of the attitude of life of a group of people who use money as a standard of truth and as absolute power. Corruption has been going on for a long time, since the times of Ancient Egypt, Babylonia, Rome until the Middle Ages and until now. The purpose of this study is to determine the eradication of corruption and law enforcement in terms of the perspective of legal philosophy as a philosophy of implementing positive law in Indonesia. This study is normative legal research with descriptive method which explains that this legal research is carried out using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Philosophy of Law which is the basic foundation of thinking in the application of any applicable legal rules and is considered in many branches of science gets special attention on the enforcement of corruption which should be done in eradicating corruption so that enforcement is not only based on written rules alone in eradicating but the eradication of corruption animates law enforcement in enforcement of corruption, written laws can be regulated, but these rules can be implemented by the implementers so that when the rules apply at the time of a criminal act of corruption, they can be in line with what has been written in the laws and regulations.

Democracy is a political system that has been adopted by practically every country in the world over the course of history. Freedom and equal rights are not just important political ideals in liberal countries, but they are also important in communist countries, which are known as people's democracies.. While our country adheres to the political system of Pancasila democracy, Indonesia follows the political system of Pancasila democracy, i.e., the original democracy of the Indonesian nation with the values contained in it derived from the Indonesian people's philosophy of life, and whose implementation is written in the preamble and body of the 1945 Constitution.

The majority of Indonesians make their living from farming, which requires a lot of area to grow crops. To produce fresh land for farmers, a small amount of forest must be cleared. The cost of land cannot be increased by cutting down and burning trees and forests, according to the legislation. However, there are several exceptions to local rules, such as burning up to 2 hectares of land per family head, growing local kinds, and encircling themselves with fire traps to prevent disease transmission, but not to the environment. The study's goal was to examine into the involvement of local sages in land clearance, forest burning, and land burning, as well as the establishment of land clearing operations against police officers who broke local laws. This research method combines a legal (sculpture) and a conceptual approach. The findings demonstrate the importance of local wisdom in large-scale forest fire prevention through constitutional acknowledgment of local wisdom.