This paper examines the relation between firm performance and the timing of annual report releases in an emerging capital market. Based on the population of listed Chinese firms with A-shares for 1994-1997, we find that good news firms release their annual reports earlier than bad news firms, and loss firms release their annual reports the latest. Moreover, consistent with Chambers and Penman (1984) and Begley and Fischer (1998), these firms unexpectedly accelerate the release of good news and delay the disclosure of bad news relative to their previous reporting pattern. We also observe a significant price reaction to the annual earnings announcements for both early (good news) and late (bad news) reporting firms. Similar results are found for those A-share firms which have also issued B-or H-shares to foreign investors. Our study documents a systematic timing pattern of annual report disclosures, which is useful for investors to predict future earnings, especially in anticipating bad news in China's emerging market where information about future earnings is very limited.
This study investigates the value relevance of earnings in the emerging capital market of China by examining the information content of accounting earnings measured under the People's Republic of China Accounting Standards (PRC-GAAP). Based on the A-shares of listed Chinese firms during 1994± 97, a significant association is observed between annual market-adjusted stock return and the change of earnings. Also documented is a significant price reaction to the annual earnings announcement in a three-day window centered around the announcement date. Overall, the empirical results suggest that earnings reported in China are value-relevant to A-share investors.
This paper examines the incremental information content of disclosures in the 10-K reports filed with the SEC through the EDGAR system with a research design that explicitly controls for cross-sectional differences in the informativeness of current and prior disclosures. More specifically, we investigate (1) whether stock returns exhibit abnormal behavior when the 10-K reports are filed with the SEC through the EDGAR system and (2) whether there exist preemptive and delayed market responses to disclosures in these reports. We also run tests for the pre-EDGAR 10-K reports submitted through the paper filing system to compare our results with those of prior studies. Our empirical results indicate that the 10-K report filed through the EDGAR system contains incremental information while the 10-K report filed through the prior paper filing system does not. This provides empirical evidence in support of the advantage of the EDGAR system over the previous paper filing system in disseminating information to investors in a timely fashion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.