Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is more common in renal transplant and dialysis patients than the general population. However, RCC in transplanted kidneys is rare, and treatment has previously consisted of nephrectomy with a return to dialysis. There has been recent interest in nephron-sparing procedures as a treatment option for RCC in allograft kidneys in an effort to retain allograft function. Four patients with RCC in allograft kidneys were treated with nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or radiofrequency ablation. All of the patients are without evidence of recurrence of RCC after treatment. We found nephron-sparing procedures to be reasonable initial options in managing incidental RCCs diagnosed in functioning allografts to maintain an improved quality of life and avoid immediate dialysis compared with radical nephrectomy of a functioning allograft. However, in non-functioning renal allografts, radical nephrectomy may allow for a higher chance of cure without the loss of transplant function. Consequently, radical nephrectomy should be utilized whenever the allograft is non-functioning and the patient's surgical risk is not prohibitive.

Purpose Assess tobacco screening and counseling in student health clinics, including facilitators, barriers, and associations with campus and state-level variables. Design Mixed-methods study with an online survey and qualitative interviews. Setting Student health clinics on college campuses. Subjects 71 clinic directors or designees from 10 southeastern states (quantitative survey) and 8 directors or designees from 4 southeastern states (qualitative interviews). Measures Quantitative measures included demographics, screening and counseling practices, clinic-level supports for such practices, perceptions of tobacco on campus, institution size, public/private status, state tobacco farming revenue and state tobacco control funding. Qualitative measures included barriers and facilitators of tobacco screening and counseling practices. Analysis Logistic and linear regression models assessed correlates of screening and counseling. Qualitative data were analyzed using multi-stage interpretive thematic analysis. Results 55% of online survey respondents reported their clinics screen for tobacco at every visit, while 80% reported their clinics offer counseling and pharmacotherapy. Barriers included lack of: time with patients, relevance to chief complaint, student self-identification as a tobacco user, access to pharmacotherapy, and interest in quitting among smokers. In multivariable models, more efforts to reduce tobacco use, student enrollment, and state-level cash receipts for tobacco were positively associated with clinic-level supports. Conclusion This study highlights missed opportunities for screening. While reports of counseling were higher, providers identified many barriers.