In the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial, neither systemic hypothermia nor supplemental protective drug affected short- or long-term neurologic outcomes of patients undergoing temporary clipping.

No abstract

No abstract

Background:Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon is a well-known cause of shoulder pain that is commonly managed with arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis when conservative treatment fails.Purpose:To present an arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral biceps tenodesis technique known as “Loop ’n’ Tack” tenodesis and to report the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2 years of follow-up.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A retrospective review of all patients who had undergone Loop ’n’ Tack tenodesis between January 2009 and May 2014 was completed. Charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted for demographic data, time from surgery, concomitant procedures, and workers’ compensation status, as well as visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores.Results:Complete follow-up evaluations were performed for 59 of 68 patients (87%). Mean follow-up was 43 months. A majority (88%) of patients had at least 1 additional procedure performed at the time of biceps tenodesis. The mean ASES shoulder score improved from 42.6 preoperatively to 91.0 postoperatively (P < .001), and 54 of 59 patients (91.5%) had a good/excellent outcome, with a UCLA shoulder score >27 and ASES shoulder score >70. Three patients (5%) reported biceps cramping pain with overuse, and 2 (3.3%) reported intermittent anterior shoulder pain. No patients had developed a “Popeye” deformity at final clinical examination, and 97% reported that they were overall satisfied with the procedure.Conclusion:The Loop ’n’ Tack tenodesis technique results in a high rate of patient satisfaction, significant improvement in shoulder outcome scores, and a low incidence of postoperative pain, with no reoperations for biceps-related pathology.

Background Perioperative hypothermia has been reported to increase the occurrence of cardiovascular complications. By increasing sympathetic nervous system activity, perioperative hypothermia also has the potential to increase cardiac injury and dysfunction associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods The Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial randomized patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery to intraoperative hypothermia (n = 499, 33.3 ± 0.8°C) or normothermia (n = 501, 36.7 ± 0.5°C). Cardiovascular events (hypotension, arrhythmias, vasopressor use, myocardial infarction, etc.) were prospectively followed until 3 month follow-up and were compared between hypothermic and normothermic patients. A subset of 62 patients (hypothermia, n = 33; normothermia, n = 29) also had preoperative and postoperative (within 24 h) measurement of cardiac troponin-I and echocardiography to explore the association between perioperative hypothermia and subarachnoid hemorrhage-associated myocardial injury and left ventricular function. Results There was no difference between hypothermic and normothermic patients in the occurrence of any single cardiovascular event or in composite cardiovascular events. There was no difference in mortality (6%) between groups and there was only a single primary cardiovascular death (normothermia). There was no difference between hypothermic and normothermic patients in post- vs. preoperative left ventricular regional wall motion or ejection fraction. Compared with preoperative values, hypothermic patients had no postoperative increase in cardiac troponin-I (median change 0.00 μg/L) whereas normothermic patients had a small postoperative increase (median change + 0.01 μg/L, P = 0.038). Conclusion In patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery, perioperative hypothermia was not associated with an increased occurrence of cardiovascular events.