Background: Despite a century of research, no clear quantitative framework exists to model the fundamental processes responsible for the continuous formation and destruction of phase singularities (PS) in cardiac fibrillation. We hypothesized PS formation/destruction in fibrillation could be modeled as self-regenerating Poisson renewal processes, producing exponential distributions of interevent times governed by constant rate parameters defined by the prevailing properties of each system. Methods: PS formation/destruction were studied in 5 systems: (1) human persistent atrial fibrillation (n=20), (2) tachypaced sheep atrial fibrillation (n=5), (3) rat atrial fibrillation (n=4), (5) rat ventricular fibrillation (n=11), and (5) computer-simulated fibrillation. PS time-to-event data were fitted by exponential probability distribution functions computed using maximum entropy theory, and rates of PS formation and destruction (λ f /λ d ) determined. A systematic review was conducted to cross-validate with source data from literature. Results: In all systems, PS lifetime and interformation times were consistent with underlying Poisson renewal processes (human: λ f , 4.2%/ms±1.1 [95% CI, 4.0–5.0], λ d , 4.6%/ms±1.5 [95% CI, 4.3–4.9]; sheep: λ f , 4.4%/ms [95% CI, 4.1–4.7], λ d , 4.6%/ms±1.4 [95% CI, 4.3–4.8]; rat atrial fibrillation: λ f , 33%/ms±8.8 [95% CI, 11–55], λ d , 38%/ms [95% CI, 22–55]; rat ventricular fibrillation: λ f , 38%/ms±24 [95% CI, 22–55], λ f , 46%/ms±21 [95% CI, 31–60]; simulated fibrillation λ d , 6.6–8.97%/ms [95% CI, 4.1–6.7]; R 2 ≥0.90 in all cases). All PS distributions identified through systematic review were also consistent with an underlying Poisson renewal process. Conclusions: Poisson renewal theory provides an evolutionarily preserved universal framework to quantify formation and destruction of rotational events in cardiac fibrillation.
Background: Both catheter and surgical ablation strategies offer effective treatments of atrial fibrillation (AF). The hybrid (joint surgical and catheter) ablation for AF is an emerging rhythm control strategy. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hybrid ablation of AF.Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis interrogating PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1991, to November 30, 2017, using the following search terms: "Cox-maze," "mini-maze," "ablation methods (including radiofrequency, cryoablation, cryomaze)," and "surgery." Included studies required ablation procedures to be hybrid and report rhythm follow-up.Results: We included 925 patients with AF (38% persistent, 51% longstanding persistent) from 22 single-center studies (mean follow-up of 19 months). The surgical lesion set consisted of pulmonary vein isolation (n ¼ 11) or box lesion (n ¼ 11) with variable additional linear ablation. This was followed by sequential (n ¼ 9), staged (n ¼ 9), or combination (n ¼ 4) catheter-based ablation to ensure isolation of pulmonary veins and to facilitate additional ablation or consolidation of surgically ablated lines. Overall, sinus rhythm maintenance was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.4-85.7] and 70.7% (95% CI, 62.2-78.7) with and without antiarrhythmic drugs, respectively at 19 AE 25 (range, 6-128) months. The use of the bipolar AtriCure Synergy system and left atrial appendage exclusion conferred superior rhythm outcome without antiarrhythmic drugs (P .01). The overall complication rate was 6.
BackgroundRotors are postulated to maintain cardiac fibrillation. Despite the importance of bipolar electrograms in clinical electrophysiology, few data exist on the properties of bipolar electrograms at rotor sites. The pivot of a spiral wave is characterized by relative uncertainty of wavefront propagation direction compared to the periphery. The bipolar electrograms used in electrophysiology recording encode information on both direction and timing of approaching wavefronts.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that bipolar electrograms from the pivot of rotors have higher Shannon entropy (ShEn) than electrograms recorded at the periphery due to the spatial dynamics of spiral waves.Methods and ResultsWe studied spiral wave propagation in 2-dimensional sheets constructed using a simple cell automaton (FitzHugh-Nagumo), atrial (Courtemanche-Ramirez-Nattel) and ventricular (Luo-Rudy) myocyte cell models and in a geometric model spiral wave. In each system, bipolar electrogram recordings were simulated, and Shannon entropy maps constructed as a measure of electrogram information content. ShEn was consistently highest in the pivoting region associated with the phase singularity of the spiral wave. This property was consistently preserved across; (i) variation of model system (ii) alterations in bipolar electrode spacing, (iii) alternative bipolar electrode orientation (iv) bipolar electrogram filtering and (v) in the presence of rotor meander. Directional activation plots demonstrated that the origin of high ShEn at the pivot was the directional diversity of wavefront propagation observed in this location.ConclusionsThe pivot of the rotor is consistently associated with high Shannon entropy of bipolar electrograms despite differences in action potential model, bipolar electrode spacing, signal filtering and rotor meander. Maximum ShEn is co-located with the pivot for rotors observed in the bipolar electrogram recording mode, and may be an intrinsic property of spiral wave dynamic behaviour.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.