Background:It has recently been reported by several sources that original (i.e., present in vivo) glioma cell phenotypes or genotypes cannot be maintained in vitro. For example, glioblastoma cell lines presenting EGFR amplification cannot be established.Methods and results:IDH1 sequencing and loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed for 15 surgery samples of astrocytoma and early and late passages of cells derived from those and for 11 archival samples. We were not able to culture tumour cells presenting IDH1 mutations originating from currently proceeded 10 tumours; the same results were observed in 7 samples of archival material.Conclusion:The IDH1 mutation is expected to be almost mutually exclusive with EGFR amplification, so glioma cells with IDH1 mutations seem to represent a new group of tumour cells, which cannot be readily analysed in vitro because of their elimination. The reasons for this intriguing phenomenon should be investigated since its understanding can help to define a new therapeutic approach based on simulating in vivo conditions, responsible for tumour cells elimination in vitro. Moreover, a new model for culturing glioma cells in vitro should be designed since the current one does not provide conditions corresponding to in vivo growth.

No abstract

The rupture of saccular intracranial aneurysms (IA) is the commonest cause of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)—the most serious form of stroke with a high mortality rate. Aneurysm walls are usually characterized by an active inflammatory response, and NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) has been identified as the main transcription factor regulating the induction of inflammation-related genes in IA lesions. This transcription factor has also been related to IA rupture and resulting SAH. We and others have shown that autophagy interacts with inflammation in many diseases, but there is no information of such interplay in IA. Moreover, NF-κB, which is a pivotal factor controlling inflammation, is regulated by autophagy-related proteins, and autophagy is regulated by NF-κB signaling. It was also shown that autophagy mediates the normal functioning of vessels, so its disturbance can be associated with vessel-related disorders. Early brain injury, delayed brain injury, and associated cerebral vasospasm are among the most serious consequences of IA rupture and are associated with impaired function of the autophagy–lysosomal system. Further studies on the role of the interplay between autophagy and NF-κB-mediated inflammation in IA can help to better understand IA pathogenesis and to identify IA patients with an increased SAH risk.

Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been reported to induce apoptosis in various tumour cell lines and, recently, also in normal cells. TRAIL interacts with four receptors: two signalling receptors (TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2) and two decoy receptors (TRAIL-R3 and TRAIL-R4). We have shown that both signalling receptors are present on the surface of oligodendrocytes isolated from adult human brain (ahOL), whereas the decoy receptors are expressed at a low level on ahOL. TRAIL induces ahOL apoptosis--as characterized by Annexin V staining prior to propidium iodide cell uptake--under conditions of protein synthesis inhibition. However, pre-treatment of ahOL with interferon gamma (IFNgamma) evoked susceptibility to TRAIL-induced death, which did not require inhibition of protein synthesis. A blocking experiment with monoclonal antibodies directed against TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 revealed that TRAIL-R1 is mainly involved in TRAIL-induced apoptosis of ahOL. In contrast to ahOL, microglial cells were completely resistant to cell death induced by TRAIL. Microglial cells had high surface expression of the decoy receptor TRAIL-R3, suggesting that resistance of these glial cells to TRAIL-induced death depends on the presence of the protective effect of TRAIL-R3. Stimulation of microglia with TRAIL increased further expression of TRAIL-R3, but it had no effect on the expression of TRAIL receptors by ahOL. This result may implicate TRAIL as an effector-immune molecule in selective ahOL demise in inflammatory/demyelinating conditions.

BackgroundAlthough features of variable differentiation in glioblastoma cell cultures have been reported, a comparative analysis of differentiation properties of normal neural GFAP positive progenitors, and those shown by glioblastoma cells, has not been performed.MethodsFollowing methods were used to compare glioblastoma cells and GFAP+NNP (NHA): exposure to neural differentiation medium, exposure to adipogenic and osteogenic medium, western blot analysis, immunocytochemistry, single cell assay, BrdU incorporation assay. To characterize glioblastoma cells EGFR amplification analysis, LOH/MSI analysis, and P53 nucleotide sequence analysis were performed.ResultsIn vitro differentiation of cancer cells derived from eight glioblastomas was compared with GFAP-positive normal neural progenitors (GFAP+NNP). Prior to exposure to differentiation medium, both types of cells showed similar multilineage phenotype (CD44+/MAP2+/GFAP+/Vimentin+/Beta III-tubulin+/Fibronectin+) and were positive for SOX-2 and Nestin. In contrast to GFAP+NNP, an efficient differentiation arrest was observed in all cell lines isolated from glioblastomas. Nevertheless, a subpopulation of cells isolated from four glioblastomas differentiated after serum-starvation with varying efficiency into derivatives indistinguishable from the neural derivatives of GFAP+NNP. Moreover, the cells derived from a majority of glioblastomas (7 out of 8), as well as GFAP+NNP, showed features of mesenchymal differentiation when exposed to medium with serum.ConclusionOur results showed that stable co-expression of multilineage markers by glioblastoma cells resulted from differentiation arrest. According to our data up to 95% of glioblastoma cells can present in vitro multilineage phenotype. The mesenchymal differentiation of glioblastoma cells is advanced and similar to mesenchymal differentiation of normal neural progenitors GFAP+NNP.